Guandao
Rajah of Minyue, Hlai and Langkasuka
Argentines 10
Benin (Dahomey)/Benin (Nigeria) 26
Berbers/Tuareg 18
Bulgarians/Romanians/Other Balkans 22
Creek/Muskogee/Other SE NA (22+1)=23 My Southeast book is the thickest out of all the Smithsonian Handbooks of North American Indians, and for good reason. They have a rich history (at least archeologically wise). Also very diverse in languages. Though Mississippian era leaders are lacking, Firaxis can still use leaders from the colonial era. Definitely should be in the game over groups like the Shoshone and Sioux.
Gauls/Britons 20
Georgians 22
Gran Colombia/Other Colonial SA 8
Haida/Tlingit/Other PNW NA 26
Irish/Scottish 22
Khazars (19-3)=16 I don't find them appealing other than their conversion to Judaism, Khazar language is poorly attested, and I don't want broken Chuvash again
Kushans/Bactrians 17
Lydians/Pontus/Other Anatolians 9
Maori/Other Polynesians 24
Nepalese 22
Timurids/Other Central Asia 21
Benin (Dahomey)/Benin (Nigeria) 26
Berbers/Tuareg 18
Bulgarians/Romanians/Other Balkans 22
Creek/Muskogee/Other SE NA (22+1)=23 My Southeast book is the thickest out of all the Smithsonian Handbooks of North American Indians, and for good reason. They have a rich history (at least archeologically wise). Also very diverse in languages. Though Mississippian era leaders are lacking, Firaxis can still use leaders from the colonial era. Definitely should be in the game over groups like the Shoshone and Sioux.
Gauls/Britons 20
Georgians 22
Gran Colombia/Other Colonial SA 8
Haida/Tlingit/Other PNW NA 26
Irish/Scottish 22
Khazars (19-3)=16 I don't find them appealing other than their conversion to Judaism, Khazar language is poorly attested, and I don't want broken Chuvash again
Kushans/Bactrians 17
Lydians/Pontus/Other Anatolians 9
Maori/Other Polynesians 24
Nepalese 22
Timurids/Other Central Asia 21
It won't be nearly so difficult as the Middle Egyptian they strangely chose to write Cleopatra's dialogue in, though the fact that they couldn't be bothered with Sumerian for Gilgamesh is worrisome to say the least...Honestly, Breton would be a very strange choice, even stranger than Welsh: it might be spoken on the Continent, but it immigrated there from southeastern Britain in the Middle Ages. Some linguistic theories posit that Brythonic and Gaulish were a dialect continuum (in which case Welsh et al are sort of modern descendants of Gaulish), but those theories are by no means mainstream. Indeed, as time goes on the relationship between Insular and Continental Celtic seems to be coming under increasing scrutiny.
