Armenians 24
Ashanti 25
Burmese 22
Cherokee 16 Goths 14-3=11 Goths have a higher score than Italy? Blasphemy? Plus Ravenna is a Roman city, most of their cities probably belong to another Civ
Italians 1
Hebrews 16 Hungarians 10+1=11 I can't save Italy...So Hungary gets my vote, they have a unique history, being non-Indo-European in language
Mississippians 11
Nubians 21
Phoenicians 25
Swahili/Kilwa 22
Tibetans 22
Vietnamese 21
Zimbabweans 22
Armenians 24+1=25 Very interesting, old and turbulent history.
Ashanti 25
Burmese 22
Cherokee 16
Goths 11
Italians 1-3=0 There are too many city state worthy places in Italy for this Civ to work and as such, is eliminated.
Hebrews 16
Hungarians 11
Mississippians 11
Nubians 21
Phoenicians 25
Swahili/Kilwa 22
Tibetans 22
Vietnamese 21
Zimbabweans 22
Armenians / Georgians 25
Ashanti 25
Burmese 22 Cherokee 16 + 1 [17] (Again, we need more Native American civs, and the Mississippians are too obscure to have entire dedicated civ.) Goths 8 - 3 [5] (NO MORE EUROPEAN CIVS REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE)
Hebrews 17
Hungarians 12
Mississippians 11
Nubians 21
Phoenicians 25
Swahili/Kilwa 22
Tibetans 22
Vietnamese 21
Zimbabweans 19
Armenians 25
Ashanti 25
Burmese 22
Cherokee 17
Goths 2 (5 - 3) Out of all European Barbarian civs, I believe they're the most important. Unfortunately, Europe is clustered as it is, so I must downvote them even though they interest me.
Hebrews 17
Hungarians 12
Mississippians 11
Nubians 21
Phoenicians 25
Swahili/Kilwa 22
Tibetans 23 (22 + 1) You should see the view from up here.
Vietnamese 21
Zimbabweans 19
Armenians 25
Ashanti 25
Burmese 22 Cherokee 17
Hebrews 17 Hungarians 9 - 3 = 6. Nothing against Hungary but gotta agree, no more Europe. A Magyar civ would be very interesting to play, but I really want to see some other cultures brought to life. Mississippians 8 + 1 = 9. Fascinating civ, wide range of influence, and highly overlooked. This would be my first choice. Nubians 21
Phoenicians 25
Swahili/Kilwa 23
Tibetans 25
Vietnamese 21
Zimbabweans 19
Armenians 22 25-3 I don't see the Armenians as a interesting Civ. Also everybody cries"No more Europe", but Armenians are Europe to.
Ashanti 25
Burmese 22
Cherokee 17
Hebrews 17
Hungarians 6
Mississippians 9
Nubians 22 = 21+1 Awesome People.
Phoenicians 25
Swahili/Kilwa 23
Tibetans 25
Vietnamese 21
Zimbabweans 19
Now it's getting hard ... African civs are truly lacking in the game, especially in the south, and Zimbabwe has a history of many centuries, unlike the Zulus who are just there because they made war against the british.
Nubia, it's not that I don't like them, but I'd prefer the others (except Mississipians, but I never downvote the same civ twice in a row)
Armenians 22
Ashanti 25
Burmese 22
Cherokee 17
Hebrews 17 Hungarians 7 + 1 = 8 I feel that this civ deserves a greater recognition in the game than just a city-state. If Austria was already inside, why not Hungary? Mississippians 6 - 3 = 3 Nothing against them, I do not get as much interest as the other civs on this list.
Nubians 19
Phoenicians 25
Swahili/Kilwa 23
Tibetans 25
Vietnamese 21
Zimbabweans 20
Armenians 22
Ashanti 25
Burmese 22
Cherokee 17
Hebrews 17 Hungarians 8 + 1 = 9 (I think Hungarians are long overdue in Civ roster. There is enough European civs, but they deserve to be represented one day.)
Nubians 20 Phoenicians 25 - 3 = 22 (I'm sorry, they are the most city-state nation ever. Other than that, other civs look more appealing to me at this moment.)
Swahili/Kilwa 23
Tibetans 25
Vietnamese 21
Zimbabweans 20
Armenians 22
Ashanti 25
Burmese 22
Cherokee 17 Hebrews 17+1=18 Perhaps the most overdue civ out of this whole list. If any civ has come close to winning a religious victory in real life, it would be them. Two major world religions with heavy influence on a third. Hungarians 9-3=6 There are other European civs I'd rather see first, but I dont even want to see them either until Firaxis tidies up Africa, Asia and America.
Nubians 20
Phoenicians 22
Swahili/Kilwa 23
Tibetans 25
Vietnamese 21
Zimbabweans 20
Armenians 22
Ashanti 25
Burmese 22 Cherokee 14 (17 - 3) -- As others have stated, there are better options. The independent invention of Native literacy is impressive, but otherwise their major accomplishments are essentially assimilating into American culture (under rather coercive policies of half-Native leaders who exploited their economic and educational advantages at the expense of their people, I might add)--and got the Trail of Tears in the end as a reward for their efforts. A Muskogean tribe would be a much better representative of the Southeast.
Hebrews 18 Hungarians 7 (6 +1) -- I don't want to see them tomorrow, but I'd still love to see them. The fact that Europe is overcrowded now doesn't mean I don't want more European civs once the rest of the world is better represented...
Nubians 20
Phoenicians 22
Swahili/Kilwa 23
Tibetans 25
Vietnamese 21
Zimbabweans 20
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
