
magyarlovag said:Cities:
Bucharest
Iasi
Cluj Napoca
Timisora
Constanta
Craiova
Galati
Brasov
Ploiesti
Sibiu
Braila
Oardea
Bracau
Arad
Pitesti
Targu Mures
Baia Mare
Buzau
Satumare
Botosani
and more.........
I have a little problem with this civ.
The Transylvanian Citys didn't founded by Romanian People.
The citys like: Arad; Cluj Napoca; Timisora; Brasov and the others founded by hungaryans and Romans.
My Opinion is: If you delete the Transylvanain citys from this civ the Romanian civilisation will be genuine.
http://members.fortunecity.com/magyarhun/magyar/id3.html
please read it.![]()
I want only the true.
, if you dont like how its done then make one for yourself.Aranor said:First off where are you from?? Mt guess would be you are Hungarian correct? I will not have this thread turn into a debate of cultures. The reason why I chose this city list is that they CURRENTLY lie within the borders of Romania I personally dont care who founded the city. If I ws doing an ethnic Romanian civ then yes these cities probably would not be included. And just so you know magyar my girlfreind is Romanian and she loves the work I have done so as far as I concerned its near perfect as is, if you dont like how its done then make one for yourself.

magyarlovag said:okay, okay I see.
and I'll try it
![]()
) But as the author of the site freely admits in his first paragraph there is no written record of migrations during the Roman withdrawl and the subsequent century following. Now it is my understanding from my own research that the Romanian claim to their territory is based on the fact that they are decended from the Getai ( the most powerful of the Thracian tribes during the Roman expantion) Now I find it hard to believe that just because the Romans could not hold the province of Dacia and withdrew ( most probably with all roman settlers) the orginal inhabitants would not have left as while they had adopted many Roman customs and even thier language they still would have felt a link to their lands and would not have abandoned their cities just because the Romans ran away ( I know its not quite that simple
) So I guess what Im saying is I can see your point of veiw but from my persective I see it differently. Thats one of the beautiful things about history you can interpret they same inforamtion differently from person to person
Ill get off my soap box now
)
) is the most distinctive part for Wallachians noblemans in that age. 

Being unfamiliar with Romanian History, Im not sure if this is "acceptable", but in the last few weeks ive been toying with different leaders, one in particular was Vlad the Impaler. who I thought "might" work as a leader for Romania.
its nowhere close to being done, but just out of curiocity, would you want to use him if/when I finished?


Being unfamiliar with Romanian History, Im not sure if this is "acceptable", but in the last few weeks ive been toying with different leaders, one in particular was Vlad the Impaler. who I thought "might" work as a leader for Romania.
its nowhere close to being done, but just out of curiocity, would you want to use him if/when I finished?
I will use him when he is done. However I really do wish for Mihai Viteazul to be done correctly with his cushme hat. At this point I plan to release the mod as is with the plans to complete the Leaderhead.
Okay, here's my attempt at the hat. There is no plume, sorry. I tried to approximate the look, but you really can't go too big on the hat because it looks bad on screen.