Gori the Grey
The Poster
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2009
- Messages
- 13,360
I have actually read the Iliad in Greek, if you can believe it. Odyssey too. One of my life accomplishments of which I'm most proud.
Last edited:
Yeah, but which Greek do you mean? Homeric, Demotic, Arcadocypriot, Melburnian?I have actually read the Iliad in Greek, if you can believe it. Odyssey too. One of my life accomplishments of which I'm most proud.
Bamboo species have similar links that span the entire globe.Across a Continent, Trees Sync Their Fruiting to the Sun
European beech trees more than 1,500 kilometers apart all drop their fruit at the same time in a grand synchronization event now linked to the summer solstice.
Warm weather is one signal that guides the masting of beech trees, but now it appears that day length does more to determine the precise timing of the fruit release among European beeches.
![]()
Across a Continent, Trees Sync Their Fruiting to the Sun | Quanta Magazine
European beech trees more than 1,500 kilometers apart all drop their fruit at the same time in a grand synchronization event now linked to the summer solstice.www.quantamagazine.org
Bamboos usually have a life cycle around 40 to 80 years, varying among species. Normally, new bamboos grow up from bamboo shoots at the roots. At infrequent intervals for most species, they will start to blossom. After blossom, flowers produce fruit (called "bamboo rice" in parts of India and China). Following this, the bamboo forest dies out. Since a bamboo forest usually grows from a single bamboo, the death of bamboos occurs in a large area.
Many bamboo species flower at extremely long intervals such as 65 or even 120 years. These taxa exhibit mass flowering (or gregarious flowering), with all plants in a particular cohort flowering over a several-year period. Any plant derived through clonal propagation from this cohort will also flower regardless of whether it has been planted in a different location. The longest mass flowering interval known is 130 years, for the species Phyllostachys bambusoides (Sieb. & Zucc.). In this species, all plants of the same stock flower at the same time, regardless of differences in geographic locations or climatic conditions, and then die. The lack of environmental impact on the time of flowering indicates the presence of some sort of "alarm clock" in each cell of the plant which signals the cessation of vegetative growth and the diversion of all energy to flower production.[1] This mechanism, as well as the evolutionary cause behind it, is still largely a mystery.
Gregarious bamboo flowering
This exotic behavior remains one of bamboo’s greatest mysteries. As if there is some kind of alarm clock in the cells of certain bamboo species, every individual member of that species will flower at the same time. This is especially bizarre because the flowering periods are so long and irregular. And it happens on a global scale.
Phyllostachys bambusoides, also known as Japanese timber bamboo, is one such example. Typically, based on historical records, it has a flowering interval of 120-130 years. Then every specimen of P. bambusoides—regardless of its location around the world—will blossom, go to seed and die. The most recent mass flowering of this species took place in the late 1960s.
Researchers, who included scientists from the University of Turin, have been using data gathered over the past 15 years.
They found the lemur calls have a steady beat, known as isochrony, showing similarity with music.
The indris have "the highest number of vocal rhythms shared with the human musical repertoire – surpassing songbirds and other mammals", Dr De Gregorio said.
Dr Daria Valente, from the University of Turin, added: “The findings highlight the evolutionary roots of musical rhythm, demonstrating that the foundational elements of human music can be traced back to early primate communication systems.”
Can we use quantum computers to do time travel and make measurements more accurately?
This one is really beyond me, and New Scientist (avoiding paywall) and Sabine Hossenfelder disagree on if anything in this paper is going backwards in time. In a terrible bit or writing, but considering the publication that probably means I would not understand a better explanation, New Scientist gloss over the critical bit with:
Arvidsson-Shukur and his colleagues designed an experiment involving two atoms set up as superconducting qubits and an unknown field that could be electric, magnetic or something else. They wanted to monitor changes in one of the qubits’ spin, to estimate the unknown field’s strength. If they didn’t know the field’s direction, they didn’t know how to prepare the spin. The solution to these kinds of problems is normally to prepare many different qubits with different spins and to use that to work out the field. But this approach involves time-consuming preparation of many electrons that are discarded before the measurement.A better approach is to send that state back in time using entanglement. In the experiment, one of two entangled qubits was placed under the influence of the field. Then, the researchers prepared a measurement on the entangled partner to send that optimal state back in time to the qubit in the field.
From the abstract it sounds to me like they are entangling two particles and doing some Bells Inequality/Quantum Computer like maths breaking. Where the time travel comes in other than where the researchers got the idea from I do not know.
![]()
Spoiler Abstract :The goal of quantum metrology is to improve measurements' sensitivities by harnessing quantum resources. Metrologists often aim to maximize the quantum Fisher information, which bounds the measurement setup's sensitivity. In studies of fundamental limits on metrology, a paradigmatic setup features a qubit (spin-half system) subject to an unknown rotation. One obtains the maximal quantum Fisher information about the rotation if the spin begins in a state that maximizes the variance of the rotation-inducing operator. If the rotation axis is unknown, however, no optimal single-qubit sensor can be prepared. Inspired by simulations of closed timelike curves, we circumvent this limitation. We obtain the maximum quantum Fisher information about a rotation angle, regardless of the unknown rotation axis. To achieve this result, we initially entangle the probe qubit with an ancilla qubit. Then, we measure the pair in an entangled basis, obtaining more information about the rotation angle than any single-qubit sensor can achieve. We demonstrate this metrological advantage using a two-qubit superconducting quantum processor. Our measurement approach achieves a quantum advantage, outperforming every entanglement-free strategy.
Spoiler Perhaps the bit that explains it? :To learn about α, we must calculate two-qubit corre- lators. Figure 2(c) illustrates with ⟨Y Z⟩. We have used entanglement to reproduce the results of Fig. 1(c): mea- suring the ancilla’s Z projects the probe’s Bloch vector onto ± ẑ, which are both optimal for sensing α. How- ever, the sensor’s sensitivity depends on the rotation axis. ⟨Y Z⟩ and ⟨ZZ⟩ cannot register rotations about the ẑ- axis (θ = 0), Fig. 2(d) shows.
We interpret these results using the language of closed time-like curves [37]. When the qubits are initialized in a singlet at T 1 , the probe is configured agnostically: for every axis m̂, ⟨σ · m̂⟩ = 0. The probe is waiting for the optimal-state input from the future. The probe undergoes the rotation; and the ancilla’s optimal basis, {|a ± ⟩}, is measured at T 2 . The measurement projects the ancilla’s state onto |a ± ⟩. This state is effectively sent backward in time and flipped into |a ∓ ⟩, to serve as the probe’s time-T 1 state. Thus, the probe is retroactively prepared in the optimal state; is rotated with U α ; and, at T 2 , undergoes a Y measurement.
Figure 2(e) demonstrates that we can obtain the maximum FI by measuring the ancilla in an n̂-dependent manner, e.g., by measuring {|a ± ⟩}. Figure 2(f) displays the FI obtained when θ ∈ [0, π] parameterizes the ro- tation axis. Regardless of the axis, we obtain a QFI of ≈ 0.82. This value is less the maximum possible QFI, due to the finite fidelity of the entangled-state preparation, detailed in [28].
Meh. It's all Greek to me
Man playing god or something like that...Apparently it is a touchy point in america, with Ron DeSantis banning it. I can see environmental issues with it, as I do not think the process is particularly environmentally friendly, but I suspect that is not Ron's problem with it.
Are these not Christians? Did not Jesus say we would do even greater things than he? Why do they not want to be like God?Man playing god or something like that...
Are these not Christians? Did not Jesus say we would do even greater things than he? Why do they not want to be like God?
Spoiler John 14:12 :Very truly I tell you, whoever believes in me will do the works I have been doing, and they will do even greater things than these, because I am going to the Father.