I agree. It even removes the arm strength factor.
Simms isn't great by any means, but I wouldn't have argued against him being the best that CBS had.
Replacing him with someone with zero actual experience seems like a pretty wild leap.
I don't dispute that. Hence the bar being set so low. The other factor in this that has nothing to do with competence or
experience is that the producers seem to force the announcers down a very narrow channel w.r.t. what they should say
and how they should say it. Given that:
means less since Romo is just going to be programmed what to say anyway.
That kind of work doesn't require near as much time/energy as a full time role on a TV show, and it probably pays just as much.
More I'd think.
Why are you so sure? Shaq has been doing commercials for long after he retired. Ditto for Joe Montana and tons of others.
Wasn't North Dallas Forty the book that really brought that out?
So can anyone explain to me why the Raiders are so fascinated with Lynch? Not only
has he been out of football for a year, but he's at the age when RBs drastically decline.
Not to mention that (IIRC) serviceable RBs are to be had in this draft.
CFC pals, I'm so sad that the Browns won't foolishly pick someone else and let the 49ers get Myles Garrett. Does anyone have any words of hope or comfort to soothe my heavy heart?
They are the Browns. With them, there is always hope for a monumental screw up. They may decide to use the number one pick in the draft on a cheerleader.