At first I used to keep track of the status of all the games on an excel spreadsheet, including grand strategies, troop positioning, plans for cities, etc etc.
Sweet! Why would you ever stop doing that??!

At first I used to keep track of the status of all the games on an excel spreadsheet, including grand strategies, troop positioning, plans for cities, etc etc.
Sweet! Why would you ever stop doing that??!![]()
I could probably write up a small scouting report on at least a few players around here.
Uuuuuuuuh am I one of those?![]()
Actually no. The scouting report on you is incredibly small and easy to remember![]()
You aren't that difficult to see through either.
I'm only like that in response to you! In games not involving you I'm very different, and in fact, even with other leaders I'm very different!
I have an interesting ethical question... how do you feel about testing specific MultiPlayer situations in SP environment?
Let's say I have a complex military situation in a MPP game so I create a similar situation in SP (using WB) and I test different battle options in that SP game... how would you consider it? Perfectly normal? Not very ethical? Completely forbidden?
I have an interesting ethical question... how do you feel about testing specific MultiPlayer situations in SP environment?
I´m perfectly fine with it, just like I am with the Advanced battle odds of the BUG-mod.