Pedophiles to launch political party

[Fox Mccloud]

If you don't like, then why don't you go somewhere else? Sorry you America so much,

Spoiler :

always read the article before posting your opinion, it's netherlands

I know where it is. I read that much. I don't want it to come here, though.

 

[Neomega]

Yes, Bozo, you comments are hilarious.

 

[Neomega]

I know where it is. I read that much. I don't want it to come here, though.

Guess what, you are being overdramatic.

You would still rather go to the Netherlands than Iran, if forced to choose.

 

[Fox Mccloud]

If the Dutch got rid of this "political party", then yes, I'd rather be in the Netherlands.

If I had children, and lived in the Netherlands where this party is legal, I would be afraid to let them out of the house. This would apply to my dogs too. Do you want to live in a country like that?

 

[Neomega]

If the Dutch got rid of this "political party", then yes, I'd rather be in the Netherlands.

And if they didn't, you would rather be in Iran? I call BS.

 

[Bozo Erectus]

At least in the US politicians only screw the voters.

 

[tomsnowman123]

If I had children, and lived in the Netherlands where this party is legal, I would be afraid to let them out of the house. This would apply to my dogs too. Do you want to live in a country like that?

I would think (or at least hope) that this party is legal in the US also, as long as they don't break any laws.

 

[Fox Mccloud]

If I was in Iran, at least I wouldn't have to worry about paedos. They would all be excuted. In the Netherlands I wouldn't have to worry about this BS.

 

[Fox Mccloud]

I would think (or at least hope) that this party is legal in the US also, as long as they don't break any laws.

Yes, because when their in charge, theirs no laws to break!

 

[Perfection]

Yes, because when their in charge, theirs no laws to break!

You honestly think that they'd get to be in charge?

Them being a party doesn't put them in charge.

 

[Fox Mccloud]

You honestly think that they'd get to be in charge?

Them being a party doesn't put them in charge.

Of course not. Theirs no way they'd get enough votes.

 

[tomsnowman123]

Yes, because when their in charge, theirs no laws to break!

I highly doubt that they would abolish laws. Although it would be kind of cool (not by them specifically, however).

 

[Fox Mccloud]

If they'd take the actions the article talks about, they'd allow anything! Never underestimate stupidity.

 

[tomsnowman123]

If they'd take the actions the article talks about, they'd allow anything! Never underestimate stupidity.

Actually...

The party wants private possession of child pornography to be allowed although it supports the ban on the trade of such materials.

So they do have some rules.

 

[Fox Mccloud]

How do you distribute and own something if you ban the trade of it?

 

[Perfection]

Of course not. Theirs no way they'd get enough votes.

So then what's the big deal about allowing them to form a politcal party?

 

[Fox Mccloud]

So then what's the big deal about allowing them to form a politcal party?

Your ok with them on the street? Sick "people" like this can be a danger, even if they are a small minority, especially when the organize.

 

[YNCS]

Freedom of speech is meaningless if it does not include the right to say the unpopular thing. It means freedom of speech for all, even those who are wrong or morally repugnant.

 

[Fox Mccloud]

Freedom of speech is meaningless if it does not include the right to say the unpopular thing. It means freedom of speech for all, even those who are wrong or morally repugnant.

So people who advocate murdur are ok with you?

 

[Perfection]

Your ok with them on the street? Sick "people" like this can be a danger, even if they are a small minority, especially when the organize.

If they don't commit any crime they shouldn't be forced to do time. How can advocating a political position be a crime in a democratic nation?