Strategic Party Affiliation

I was specifically speaking about ethics. Having a system easily abusable doesn't change the fact that it's deliberate manipulation.
Yes it is manipulation, and nothing much can be done about it unless you change the primary procedure, but nobody ever wants to risk limiting voter turnout in the US. That's just the mentality you're up against.

Personally I would go the route that Arwon says happens in Australia where, if you want to be a party member and vote in their elections, you just pay money. That will create some incentive for honesty at least. That is how a party would police its members. Because the government won't do it.
After all, you don't have an inherent right to be a member of a political party...
 
but nobody ever wants to risk limiting voter turnout in the US.
Uh this is borderline standard policy by one of the two governing US parties and the other one is mostly apathetic about it lol
 
Poll tax? Great idea. We got the best out here defending democracy lmao
 
prairie landowners and yeomen.

Yeomen went extinct as a class the moment farms became more hyper efficient due to industrialization and concentrated their existence in the Midwest via large corporatist entities sprayed with petroleum derived pesticides & nitrogen fertilizer that forgoes the crop rotation of more colonial times (thus allowing even further consolidation, cause obviously without crop rotation you no longer have to keep some of the fields fallow and therefore can produce more food with less land thereby = less farmers employable). Plus the railroads of course (owned by robber barons) who facilitated this ability for the food to come from further away and be no longer locally produced.

Prairie landlords used to be the old slave owning plantationist class before the slaves were freed. After that they moved west to ranch cattle (hence prairie landlords). Then once cattle became cheaper because of hyper efficiency (again mostly because of railroads) they started drilling for oil on their ranches. Thus they became the oil tycoon class, which now finances big tech to move on over to Texas so they can move on over and graduate to being a robo-slave class the moment oil no longer is profitable (because of climate change regulations).

In other words the prairie landlords still exist, but the yeoman who founded this country no longer do. The southerners beat the northerners.
 
One might hope Sneeches is the prophetic end result of all this.
 
But who weeps for the yeomen?
 
They do fine picking strawberries and packing meat, I'm sure. They might even be on to fix your car, just not live in your kid's school district. Not sure why!

Don't forget shearing the endless grass non-crop, tending the sprawling corporate decorative shrubs, and shoving parking lot snow.
 
But who weeps for the yeomen?

Most yeomen were smallhold farmers.

At the time America was mostly agrarian, meaning most of the population owned land of some sort before industrialization started pushing more and more people into the cities. Then only the most ruthless yeomen survived and bought out the land of the struggling ones via industrialization making produce too cheap for those with less productive land to compete as farmers.

So I lied, the yeomen just turned into big agro. A.k.a. General Mills and Monsanto board of directors.
 
It's Bayer now, if you want the pop culture punching block corporation that serves the badmen.
 
The question then is, should I change my party affiliation to Republican to vote against Trump in the primary?
These types of shenanigans rarely if ever work. Every election, much ado is made about people potentially changing their party affiliation to impact the primary of the other party, but it never happens in significant enough numbers to change the winner, either of the state's individual primary, or the primary as a whole. Numerous Democrats supposedly voted for Nikki Haley in the NH primary along with lots of independents/unaffiliated voters, which the analysts are claiming is a big part of why she got such a substantial share of the primary vote in that state. However, the end result was the same, Trump won with a majority of the vote and its highly unlikely that people switching party affiliation will prevent Trump from ultimately winning the Republican primary.

Back in 2008 Rush Limbaugh was famously calling for something he dubbed "Operation Chaos", whereby he was encouraging Republicans to change party affiliation and vote in the Democratic primaries for Hillary, in order to drag them out all the way to the convention by preventing Obama from winning outright. The goal was to make the primary as bitter and contentious as possible between Hillary and Obama supporters so that there could be no possibility of reconciliation and party unity at the end of the process. IIRC, there was also a secondary goal of forcing the winner to be picked by the Democrats' "superdelagates", privileged party leaders and insiders that get extra, more powerful votes than the voters-at-large in the primary process. The idea was that would also serve to infuriate the supporters of the losing candidate and cause the Democrats support to implode.

In any case, Operation Chaos didn't work. Obama won the primary and went on to win the election in a landslide.
 
I've only just learned about Nevada. If you haven't heard about it, it will be the next bit of clownishness in the R primary. They're having both a caucus and a primary. Haley is participating in the primary; Trump in the caucus. Only the caucus gives delegates. So Trump is guaranteed to get all the delegates, and yet Haley will also "win" (one of the two contests)! :crazyeye:

Oh, and a person can vote in both.
I am just throwing this in here. This is the system "working", and it is immoral for an individual to game it a bit to get a bit more of a say in who runs the country?
 
Well I went ahead and did it. I just filled out the online application to change my party affiliation to Republican. There was nothing in the application to say I agree with the party line of the party I'm affiliated with. We'll see if I actually get my voter card in time for the presidential primary. Then I have to decide if the other primaries are important enough for me to keep it as Republican, or if I'll change it back.
 
I forgot to update this thread. I voted back in March in the Republican presidential primary for Nikki Haley. Obviously that was not enough to help her win. Then in June was the Republican primary for statewide offices. Most of the Republican candidates seemed fairly similar to each other, but I tried to vote for people who emphasized the free market side of things and not the pro-Trump or evangelical side of things. There was one race for Oklahoma Corporation Commissioner (the utility regulator) where two people seemed like generic Republicans, and the third seemed like a for-the-people type guy. I voted for him but he got less than 20% of the vote. Now there is a runoff for my state house district primary on August 27. The person I voted for didn't make the runoff, so I'm not sure who I'll vote for this time.
My attempts to moderate the Republican party seem like they're failing though, so I'll probably go back to being a registered Democrat after the election on the 27th. Plus I kind of want to campaign for Harris, and I would feel weird doing that as a Republican.
 
Who are the runoff candidates?
 
Plus I kind of want to campaign for Harris, and I would feel weird doing that as a Republican.
It's definitely more honorable as a Democrat but they don't mind that there's Republicans for Harris.
 
I registered as an independent back in the good old days when dinosaurs walked the Earth. My county is very Democratic, so I tend to vote their primaries to influence local elections. County is solid blue, state is solid red, doesn't really make a difference so I've been free to vote my conscience (i.e. libertarian) in national elections.
 
One might hope Sneeches is the prophetic end result of all this.
"Then, when every last cent of their money was spent, the Fix-It-Up Chappie packed up. And he went. And he laughed as he drove in his car up the beach... They never will learn. No. You can't teach a Sneetch!"

Best line of the book.
 
And honorable in that usage is the best joke I've heard all year.
 
And honorable in that usage is the best joke I've heard all year.
How is not more honorable to officially declare yourself a member of the party you are volunteering your free labor for rather than stay the other party?
 
Back
Top Bottom