Pellaken
The one and only.
I was wondering what the responce would be to a website of competing games. example:
you join a team(A) and play a game(B) to get points(C) to gain rank(D)
as you can see, there are 4 diffrent variants.
A-
the teams may be based on geographic reagons... EXAMPLE: {all states, listed with 2 letter code}
team 1-MA, ME, VT, NH, RI, CT, NY, PA, DE, MD, WV, D.C.
team 2-VA, KY, MO, OK, AR, LA, MS, AL, TN, NC, SC, GA, FL
team 3-TX, NM, AZ, CA, NV, UT, CO
team 4-WA, OR, ID, MT, WY, ND, SD, NE, KS, MN, IA, WI, IL, IN, MI, OH
team 5-Canada
team 6-Latin America and Africa -south africa
team 7-Oceanea and South Africa
team 8-Asia -japan
team 9-Japan
team 10-Britain
team 11-Germany and Scandinavia
team 12-remaning Western Europe
team 13-Eastern Europe and Russia
or by color
Red Blue Purple Yellow Green Gray Brown Orange Black White
etc....
B
games can be diffrent. Civ II, or even Civ III and Civ I, and other games. there can be a points system, but chances are it will be 1v1 or #v# so that you can eathier win or loose. a win in Civ III against 1 player, would get the same ammount of points as a win agianst that player in, say, chess or checkers.
C
a pointing system, realated to rank
D
which will probably be military. here is a rough rough copy
Generals {1 star to 4 star}
more then 1000 wins, or 100 wins undefeated
Captain
more then 500 wins, or 75 wins undefeated
*excuse my spelling* Kernel
more then 200 wins, or 50 undefeated
Lieutennant
more then 50 wins, or 25 undefeated. the first of the "regesterd" reanks. it will come with nice benifiets
Corporal
more then 20 wins, no undefeated cheat
Sergent
more then 10 wins
Private
1 win or more
recruit
no wins
maybe I will throw in a game minumum. for example, if you have played 500 games, but lost them all, you still make lieutennant.
also, included in the rank are diffrent ranks, depending on the type of 'goverment' you have in place.
anyone can challenge a leader of a country. depending on the government you can range from a low cost but high risk government, to a high cost, but low risk governemnt.
Dictatorship
The Leader {'Dur Furher' in german}
Leads the team. if he looses a battle or any sort, the enture team is severley heavley penilized, like having some wins removed, not being allowed to battle for a few days, etc...
a dictatorship will be most benifical to the team points wise, in some "points" that are available. it will make things easy to run, but limits freedom and makes a leadership loss all the much more devestaring
Monarchy
King
leader of the team. He can deffer a challenge to a prince. should he loose a battle the team is penelized, but not as heavley as in a dictatorship.
Prince
Appointed by the King, can be of any rank, from lieutennant up. outranks everyone, except other princes that outrank him.
Nobelmen
1 nobelmen exists for every 10 or 25 members, depending on how many members join the site. half are picked by the King, half are picked in a vote by the people. They outrank everyone of thier rank like a prince {if he is a captain, in a battle with an allied non-noble general, he takes command} but princes outrank nobels. All princes selected by the King, must be nobels. this limits the ammount of non-democratacally elected princes that can exist, but its perfeclet ok and acceptable to have all appointed nobels as princes
etc...
the best idea for a game is a starcraft like setup with a slower game. example, instead of building a building in 2 minutes it might take 2 human days! the "world" would be a large large world, and battles would probably take place in battlefeilds, like a midievil game....
thats all I can spew out at the moment... if you are intrested, please reply and say so...
you join a team(A) and play a game(B) to get points(C) to gain rank(D)
as you can see, there are 4 diffrent variants.
A-
the teams may be based on geographic reagons... EXAMPLE: {all states, listed with 2 letter code}
team 1-MA, ME, VT, NH, RI, CT, NY, PA, DE, MD, WV, D.C.
team 2-VA, KY, MO, OK, AR, LA, MS, AL, TN, NC, SC, GA, FL
team 3-TX, NM, AZ, CA, NV, UT, CO
team 4-WA, OR, ID, MT, WY, ND, SD, NE, KS, MN, IA, WI, IL, IN, MI, OH
team 5-Canada
team 6-Latin America and Africa -south africa
team 7-Oceanea and South Africa
team 8-Asia -japan
team 9-Japan
team 10-Britain
team 11-Germany and Scandinavia
team 12-remaning Western Europe
team 13-Eastern Europe and Russia
or by color
Red Blue Purple Yellow Green Gray Brown Orange Black White
etc....
B
games can be diffrent. Civ II, or even Civ III and Civ I, and other games. there can be a points system, but chances are it will be 1v1 or #v# so that you can eathier win or loose. a win in Civ III against 1 player, would get the same ammount of points as a win agianst that player in, say, chess or checkers.
C
a pointing system, realated to rank
D
which will probably be military. here is a rough rough copy
Generals {1 star to 4 star}
more then 1000 wins, or 100 wins undefeated
Captain
more then 500 wins, or 75 wins undefeated
*excuse my spelling* Kernel
more then 200 wins, or 50 undefeated
Lieutennant
more then 50 wins, or 25 undefeated. the first of the "regesterd" reanks. it will come with nice benifiets
Corporal
more then 20 wins, no undefeated cheat
Sergent
more then 10 wins
Private
1 win or more
recruit
no wins
maybe I will throw in a game minumum. for example, if you have played 500 games, but lost them all, you still make lieutennant.
also, included in the rank are diffrent ranks, depending on the type of 'goverment' you have in place.
anyone can challenge a leader of a country. depending on the government you can range from a low cost but high risk government, to a high cost, but low risk governemnt.
Dictatorship
The Leader {'Dur Furher' in german}
Leads the team. if he looses a battle or any sort, the enture team is severley heavley penilized, like having some wins removed, not being allowed to battle for a few days, etc...
a dictatorship will be most benifical to the team points wise, in some "points" that are available. it will make things easy to run, but limits freedom and makes a leadership loss all the much more devestaring
Monarchy
King
leader of the team. He can deffer a challenge to a prince. should he loose a battle the team is penelized, but not as heavley as in a dictatorship.
Prince
Appointed by the King, can be of any rank, from lieutennant up. outranks everyone, except other princes that outrank him.
Nobelmen
1 nobelmen exists for every 10 or 25 members, depending on how many members join the site. half are picked by the King, half are picked in a vote by the people. They outrank everyone of thier rank like a prince {if he is a captain, in a battle with an allied non-noble general, he takes command} but princes outrank nobels. All princes selected by the King, must be nobels. this limits the ammount of non-democratacally elected princes that can exist, but its perfeclet ok and acceptable to have all appointed nobels as princes
etc...
the best idea for a game is a starcraft like setup with a slower game. example, instead of building a building in 2 minutes it might take 2 human days! the "world" would be a large large world, and battles would probably take place in battlefeilds, like a midievil game....
thats all I can spew out at the moment... if you are intrested, please reply and say so...