Pinochet Common Misconceptions

Status
Not open for further replies.
"Freedom for me, but not for thee!" Screams, the university educated Westerner, "I love the Hispanics!"

What insane hypocrites.

Are you referring to anyone in particular with this, or is it just some random quote from the Pinochet sycophant handbook?
 
The only misconception that matters happened in February 1915.

ahahahah +1

thewebz said:
The following events occurred in February 1915: Contents. [hide]. 1 February 1, 1915 (Monday) ..... Born: Carlos Prats, Chilean army officer and politician, Commander-in-chief of the Chilean Army during the 1973 coup
 
51yHJMOpNkL.jpg


was going to cut-paste Pinochet head on that but i am to lazy.
 
Seems about right. On Western university campuses anyway, fortunately the working class has much more sense.
 
Seems about right. On Western university campuses anyway, fortunately the working class has much more sense.

Said someone who claims to have been educated at a Canadian university. How did they not eliminate your "working class sense"?
 
Put this in the right thread this time...
The problem is Pinochet didn't stop with the communists, anyone who didn't agree with him 1000% was targeted. It's what happens when a military figure has absolute power, they think in military terms as in anyone who isn't with me is an enemy to be destroyed.
 
Put this in the right thread this time...
The problem is Pinochet didn't stop with the communists, anyone who didn't agree with him 1000% was targeted. It's what happens when a military figure has absolute power, they think in military terms as in anyone who isn't with me is an enemy to be destroyed.

Chile should have just submitted to the communist tyranny says the Westerner. If that's the case, you should have let Hitler have his way with you. Wouldn't want to kill any Nazis denying you your rights and freedoms.

And the allies never had internment camps, contrary to what's in the history books. <--- Sarcasm
 
Last edited:
Put this in the right thread this time...
The problem is Pinochet didn't stop with the communists, anyone who didn't agree with him 1000% was targeted. It's what happens when a military figure has absolute power, they think in military terms as in anyone who isn't with me is an enemy to be destroyed.

Which explains how sycophants are created...survival instinct leads to brown snoutery.
 
Chile should have just submitted to the communist tyranny says the Westerner. If that's the case, you should have let Hitler have his way with you. Wouldn't want to kill any Nazis denying you your rights and freedoms.

And the allies never had internment camps, contrary to what's in the history books.
The westerner has not said such thing. You should read the westerner better.

BTW who is the westerner?
 
Chile should have just submitted to the communist tyranny says the Westerner. If that's the case, you should have let Hitler have his way with you. Wouldn't want to kill any Nazis denying you your rights and freedoms.
You posted this exact same thing in another thread. Are you copy-pasting your arguments?

And the allies never had internment camps, contrary to what's in the history books.
Is this a semantic argument, that the camps were the Allies interned people did not qualify as "interment camps", or are you claiming that the evidence of such camps has been fabricated?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom