Seems like the right plan except we want universal suffrage, not rep.
What for do we want universal suffrage?? And keep in mind we will get 2 free specialists per city. That means (after settling the fillers) around 34-38 free specialists. This would mean 102-105 free breakers + multipliers, what would raise it to more than 152 just from rep!! And as we're not in any hurry building infa or military I don't see any effort in taking US!!
The reason I wanted US is that we have a bunch of cottages, and production becomes more and more important as the game goes on. Buying buildings also helps get cities online faster. Rep isn't the worst thing ever, however.Finally I played my turns and here's the report:
IT:
MM to get demo in 4 turns
1690:
Toku came to ask for this:
Spoiler :![]()
Decided to decline..
But an Acadamy was build in Hastings.
1695:
We got lucky:
Spoiler :![]()
1705:
The turn our plan comes together:
Demo is in + Nottingham finished it's Stock Exchange + London born another GS so we started our GA, switched to Rep, Nation, Eman, Merc, Free Rel as well as we started on the stature in Nottingham and on Oxford in Hastings. Did I say that I do love it when a plan comes together??
Techwise we went for RepParts, 'cause Econ and Coop would not make any effort right at the moment..
This seems like a really poor deal. Picking up a series of techs we haven't bothered much with for liberalism, which is important to later techs.Additionally we got this:
Spoiler :![]()
And we've got another trading partner! Wang Kong agreed to this deal:
Spoiler :![]()
Replaceable parts is a good tech, and saving time on it is good. I'm not sure two rounds was worth trading liberalism around like that, but at least this is a real benefit.1710:
Mao demanded Constitiution but I declined, and Wang Kong asked for OB what I accepted.
1715:
Right here's the reason why I made the deal with Wang Kong above:
Spoiler :![]()
Charly was the only one (except of Toku) who still missed Lib so we saved two rounds in RepParts!
1720 --> 1730:
Build Infra.. Nothing worth to mention..
1735:
Obsolete asked for OB and I accepted.
And here I finished.
There are two more round of GA.. And we definetely should stop dreaming of stealing something from someone. For me it seems the costs for stealing are even raising.. And our resurch is that good, that I'm sure we'll get far ahead soon, so no tech will be availabe for stealing.. So I fired nearly every spy and took scientists or merchants..
BTW: The question how to feed our NP city still remains..
In other news...
Cripp is up. God, why does he never think he's up?!![]()
I'd rather go for Astro right after economics 'cause we need observatories online pretty soon to keep up in the tech race! And afterwards I'd go for Assembly line for factories!
And about the stealing: I'm not very familiar with this, but I think we're teching a bit too fast to steal more than some backfillers.. As far as I see astro would be a key tech right at the moment, but we need nearly 3 times as much EPs on Mao as we already have to steal it! If you'd ask me, I'd say it would be a waste of 10% science.. Build those bureaus but better leave the slider where it is!
Since space seems the best option, we should start considering the key techs: robotics (elevator), computers (internet), and...whatever gives labs. I forget. Anything on the way to those is important. We might also want SOME military...
Wow, that's pretty important.Pregame
Turn 263
Mao declares on Obsolete
Even more so. This puts Mao firmly in the "man to beat" spot.Turn 264
Liverpool library>harbor
Toku has captured 2 of Obsoletes cities now
And this only solidifies it.Turn 265
Cahokia stock>observatory
Brighton granary>court
Turn 266
Hastings jail>observatory
Mound City grocer>customs
Coventry jail>harbor
Dover (renamed National Park) court>library
Turn 267
Mao's GA has begun
slider to 80%(-19)
Turn 268
zzz
Turn 269
Just a matter of time...sorry
Spoiler :![]()
York settler>observatory
Canterbury jail>customs
Oxford frigate>levee
SP in queue up SM, we have 2 sources of coal
Spoiler :![]()
Turn 270
Wang offers a trade..not right now
Spoiler :![]()
London observatory>customs
Nottingham SoL!>observatory
Toku captures another city of Obsolete
Turn 271
Cahokia observatory>musket
Newcastle bureau>frigate
Settled Dover >granary
Mao canceled all deals and closed borders..stopped here
The only thing I can think of is our power rating is bottomed out, start drafting some units and go into military mode to get our power up. We're 1t from SM.
Just took a bit deeper look at the save.. Just one question: Why the hell did we change to free market?We didn't have OB with more than two other leaders.. Therefore FM makes defenitely NO sense! (Keep in mind we have Rep and therefore 3 additional breakers per specialist..) So I think we should switch back as fast as possible![\quote]
I switch to FM because I thought with the +1tr would be bringing in more, but since Mao closed borders I can understand that. I'll make note off that for future games.
And stop the custom houses as they don't pay off at the moment, as well as we should stop staration in Mound City!! And shouldn't we rather have gone for AssemblyLine instaed of resurching SM?? This would obsolete our monasties and I far as I see we don't need it at the moment, 'cause there's still enough other stuff to go for (and the free scientist from phisics is gone already..).
Yeah customs work with FM. Stop what in Mound? There's only 1t left in SM so we could switch to AL.
BTW: We may steal MilTrad from Mao!
That can done
I switch to FM because I thought with the +1tr would be bringing in more, but since Mao closed borders I can understand that. I'll make note off that for future games.
I saw that Mao closed borders after the switch to FM as well. No real way to predict whether an AI is going to close borders, so while FM may have not panned out, I dont see a huge basis for arguing against FM originally, when we had 3 trading partners.
I saw that Mao closed borders after the switch to FM as well. No real way to predict whether an AI is going to close borders, so while FM may have not panned out, I dont see a huge basis for arguing against FM originally, when we had 3 trading partners.