Since I'm far better at the peaceful aspects of the game, I recently got into the habit of cramming a few more AIs into medium-sized maps to brush up my warmongering skills.
In my current game gas Gandhi's Evil Twin, I'm stuck on a fairly small continent with Monty, Tokugawa and Gilgamesh.
I'd lament my unjust fate, but I have only myself to blame since I wiped out the good guys (Roosevelt and Ramesses) because they were easy and juicy targets.
Gil and Toku are protective, so I threw the rest of my faltering military against Monty before he got going, pushing him back into an unproductive wasteland before making peace.
With 3 conquered capitals and twice the score of my nearest competitor, I like my power base in the long run, but I'm everyone's worst enemy. Monty is understandably furious, I don't trust Gilgamesh one bit and Tokugawa has a -2 for close borders so further war is inevitable.
If I don't suffer a humiliating military defeat soon, the game should be essentially won but the real question to me is: was it the correct choice to take out the easy prey while also playing builder, or should I have made sure I'm the only predator on the continent?
This is a dilemma I often face - the civilizations I want crippled are rarely the ones that are easy to take down while tempting victims could also be valuable allies in the future.
In my current game gas Gandhi's Evil Twin, I'm stuck on a fairly small continent with Monty, Tokugawa and Gilgamesh.
I'd lament my unjust fate, but I have only myself to blame since I wiped out the good guys (Roosevelt and Ramesses) because they were easy and juicy targets.
Gil and Toku are protective, so I threw the rest of my faltering military against Monty before he got going, pushing him back into an unproductive wasteland before making peace.
With 3 conquered capitals and twice the score of my nearest competitor, I like my power base in the long run, but I'm everyone's worst enemy. Monty is understandably furious, I don't trust Gilgamesh one bit and Tokugawa has a -2 for close borders so further war is inevitable.
If I don't suffer a humiliating military defeat soon, the game should be essentially won but the real question to me is: was it the correct choice to take out the easy prey while also playing builder, or should I have made sure I'm the only predator on the continent?
This is a dilemma I often face - the civilizations I want crippled are rarely the ones that are easy to take down while tempting victims could also be valuable allies in the future.