Dalnorossia. Also I managed to do fine by very specifically not allying with Thlayli in the end .
You were plenty happy to take a bunch of my northern territory in an alliance with Thlayli.
Dalnorossia. Also I managed to do fine by very specifically not allying with Thlayli in the end .
And thusly gain influence with me, although that didn't particularly matter much.You were plenty happy to take a bunch of my northern territory in an alliance with Thlayli.
You were plenty happy to take a bunch of my northern territory in an alliance with Thlayli.
The second time it wasn't a rebellion, and the first time I didn't start it, just took over after the fact and conquered you while I was an established sovereign country.Greek rebellions have been part of my undoing twice, don't act like the victim here. *odd smiley that shows that I'm not angry at you, but not being silly either*
Also the part where someone's already taken Canada.Lord_Iggy said:I disliked the fact that Quebec separatism had developed almost identically to OTL, but half a century or more earlier.
Regardless of that, I have very strongly-burnt in memories of your alliance, so I will continue to think of you as Thlayli's ally, at least when it mattered.
>> I will take Russia.
What's the desicion on the UK. Its not listed on there...
*cough* Who is the UK *cough*
sorry already taken, if i may take it please dach
DACHS PAY ATTENTION TO MY INQUIRIES DAMN YOU
Who is the U.K.?
I'm only saying what my impression is, not what the facts are.Dalnorossia. Also I managed to do fine by very specifically not allying with Thlayli in the end .
Yeah, I considered before j_eps joined, my first posts were sometime before him.The second time it wasn't a rebellion, and the first time I didn't start it, just took over after the fact and conquered you while I was an established sovereign country.
Also the part where someone's already taken Canada.
Darkening (I can't bring myself to include tildes), your reservation of Nepal is noted.
You know, I'd be happy with just Dark . Or he-who-sucks-above-all if you wish :}
Or Mr. C.A.T Skinner
Thank you.flyingchicken called it fifty posts before you did (edit: in post #58).
...
Flavius Aetius is listed by Dachspmg on the first page, and since Dachspmg has no where said otherwise, the logical conclusion would be Flavius Aetius.
It depends. In all seriousness, anything that's been okay for das' AFSNES should be okay for this as well (although naturally upgraded for the twentieth century); outlines of operational doctrine, the use of particular armaments, which school of thought (such as they were) you happen to support...that sort of thing. I want to minimize the overall length of PMs, and including tactics, operational doctrine, and your grand strategy in every one seems a bit much.On an actually relevant note, how detailed do you want our military doctrines to be, Dachs?
@Dis: Yes, the plan worked awfully, considering my absolute victory over the Ottomans. You just realized that the wind was blowing the FK's way, and didn't want to incur Stormy's wrath by assisting in the collapse of his Middle Eastern ally.