Lord Parkin
aka emperor
Neither will Napoleon or Tokugawa, apparently.intel report?
hum, not really.
But a nice excel sheet, with every detail on the various leaders personalities :
http://forums.civfanatics.com/downloads.php?do=file&id=3359.
It's somehow hard to read, but full of very important informations, like this one :
Alexander will never agree to a permanent alliance![]()
Wow, thanks, that's a really great and useful reference. Quite a bit of bedtime reading to get through.


Question:
I haven't played much with Permanent Alliances before, so I have some questions. Are they exactly like teams games? I've tested them and have noticed the same things in common - shared line of sight, view of each others cities and what they are building, shared research (with +50% research cost penalty), inability to declare war on each other, lasts for the entire rest of the game. Is there anything different between a teams game and Permanent Alliances? So far the only thing I've noticed is that teams games can have more than 2 people on the same team, whereas Permanent Alliances appear to be only between two civs, ever.
Has anybody ever played with Permanent Alliances in multiplayer, and used them? To me it seems like there would be no benefits over a 'verbal alliance' deal, and in fact would be hindering to both civs (due to the 50% research penalty).