Of course they are going above and beyond with representation. With a setting like this, you have to make compromises in "accuracy" if you want to do that. It's a choice you can or cannot make and I find it admirable that they decided to make it.
I think the main reason behind Georgia's inclusion is the meme, not Tamar.
Despite being a person that started at Civ V, i really don't like 1UPT. I don't know, it feels more fun creating a stack of horsemen, spears, swords and catapults and then plunge them all into a city.
Or, have a garrison of 10 archers in my town, decimating an army as they wittle them down, arrow by arrow.
And gameplay wise, 1UPT is so annoying when it comes to getting your units blocked by anything.
About 1UPT, I think it's bad. I've spilled a lot of ink on why so you can search for those posts. But the central point is that it leads to a small world when modern 4Xs should strive for the opposite.
Is that a common policy? One Skyrim modder took all his mods down to protest Trump's election, and they were some of the biggest and most well-known Skyrim mods. You'd think Bethesda would have the courtesy to reupload them.
Which ones?Speaking of which, I was playing as Russia the other day and I got a few female Great Persons I'd never heard of, I couldn't even locate some on Wikipedia, Google or Yandex.
It should be pretty obvious what the point is.I don't understand the rationale of this. What's the point in forcing in historically minor figures over important ones just because of their gender?
It's here, and a pretty solid review in my opinion.There was a great essay by a guy called "Sulla" something on how this led to all the myriad problems with Civ V, but I can no longer find it.
It should be pretty obvious what the point is.
You're making the assumption that the point of having a leaderhead is to be an "iconic figure of their entire country or culture".
That's sort of the whole point. There are many baked in assumptions of what should and shouldn't be in a historical 4X game. I don't think these conventions are necessarily bad but neither is making different ones. Besides the actual stance being taken here, what I find mostly admirable is the degree to which they are willing to defy some of these conventions to take it.
Toasty!Would you find it objectionable not to talk to people like you're in debate club?
WTH? What did Trump getting elected have to with Skyrim mods?
There's a reason why the Civilization games have Golden Ages and not "Dark Ages" in them - the latter would not be fun for most players. (The Civ3 design team actually implemented a whole "Dark Ages" concept in the testing stages, and took it out of the game because it simply wasn't fun.)
He decided that if there were any Trump voters playing Skyrim, they didn't deserve to have access to his mods. Here's a conversation between him and another Skyrim player.
In one of the preview videos of Civ6 a poster was seen on a wall in the background of a video. The image was low-quality but the fans have determined that these were pictures of leaders, in the alphabetical order of civs. They've figured out a lot of them but weren't able to determine who was between Frederick Barbarossa of Germany and Pericles of Greece, it was only clear that it was a female leader. After analyzing a list of possible civs, they've found Georgia and decided the leader is Tamar. However, it turned out there was an error in that list, and Georgia was erroneously placed after Germany (and the actual leader was Gorgo of Greece). But the meme was born, and now, every time a new leader was announced, fans were joking that it's Tamar of Georgia.