Random Thoughts XIV: Pizza, Pomegranate Juice, and Shreddies

Status
Not open for further replies.
Taylor Swift is not a cult leader. She is a very successful entertainer. Talented, hardworking, smart women should be praised even if they are attractive. Clearly she offers the world much more than you or I.

Oh? Both you and Kyriakos have had much more positive effects on my life over the years. Taylor Swift has had none.

Note that I'm not saying she's had a negative effect on my life. It just means that she's not on my radar as mattering.

The cold sucks. Ok, it's not Canada-cold, but still, I don't like it :S

Right now I'm spending time in the social room in the building I live in. It snowed the other day and it's finally cold enough that I'm going to have to close the window someone left open. It's chilly in here.
 
The way I see it, Travis Kelce is aware of the risk that if he does something stupid, it's probably going to wind up in a song. He's surely also aware that some of Taylor's exes have been written about in a positive light in songs. And I believe there are even a few who haven't had songs written about them.

And with Taylor having been in a relationship (just one!) for seven consecutive years, there's precedent that one may wind up leading to marriage. She's more aware of what she wants and doesn't want, and the hazards of being someone famous where people may be interested in dating her for herself, or they might be interested in it simply for the fame. Conversely, they might be interested in dating her but not be able to handle the effects of the fame.

Is it a fun, casual fling and a chance for both of them to do something a bit different? Or something serious? Or the former with the chance to evolve to be the latter? I don't know and I don't particularly care. But I will note that the degree of seriousness in a relationship isn't necessarily something that is known up front.

Spoiler Story :

-- (story about people who aren't Taylor and Travis) --

I'm reminded of a friend who was in a relationship that neither of them intended to be serious (i.e. leading to marriage) over the course of two years. They knew that life circumstances would likely pull them apart geographically after that point, and neither of them intended to date long distance, and they were both aware of that and okay with it.

This meant that they never discussed the hard, serious questions that one might expect to come up eventually if one were concerned about that. Did they want to have kids some day? How would they manage their finances? Could they really see themselves living together forever, without the option to just go spend some time at their (nearby) parents' houses when they were upset? They punted on all those tough questions.

Eventually that life circumstance arrived, and surprisingly, it did not pull them apart geographically. So then they had a serious couple of weeks where they were trying to figure out if they were actually compatible over the long term, for a serious relationship leading towards marriage.

A few years later, they still aren't sure if they will get married, though they decided they are serious about potentially moving in that direction. Maybe they're a year behind where Taylor and Joe Alwyn were when they broke up, or maybe they'll still be together in 20 years, no one knows.

-- (end story about people who aren't Taylor and Travis) --


Point being, whether they intend for it to be serious (long term), or not, that's okay. And honestly, that relatively rapid pace of relationships in her 20s might not be a bad thing for current relationships. A wider perspective, and willingness to end things if they aren't going to work, can lead to better outcomes later, or at least avoiding poor choices. Is it worse to have a number of short relationships, or to marry the wrong person because you don't want to break up with them, even though you probably should? I know people who have gone the latter route. None of those marriages have lasted.

So, yes... at this point in time, I would date someone whose relationship history had similar chronological contours to Taylor's, if other aspects appeared to align. The bigger unknown in terms of qualifications might be Travis. I'd have to assume he's pretty decent at catching a football and blocking players from the opposing team, but how much of his life do we know through song lyrics?
 
taylor Swift is an American industry or whatever . She will get positive coverage here .
 
also noticed that those who were lined up in a quarry by Israeli soldiers have been turning up "mostly" alive . This is an era of competition in madness or faking it until making it . Yeah , supports neither and both with a million or two of qualifications .
 
had it wrong . It was Linda Evangelista who said in 1990 (adding Christy Turlington to self) that "We don't wake up for less than 10,000$ a day."
 
There is aluminum in alum.

So what is titanium in?
Build your own Titan-brand combat robot (you're in Japan after all) and use titanium in it and thus you solve your problem.
 
Speaking of titans, wasn't there supposed to be a WH40K tv series?
Amazon will be making it
BBC said:

Amazon to make Warhammer 40,000 shows and movies​

The maker of Warhammer 40,000, Games Workshop, has finalised a deal with Amazon to bring the characters and stories to the big screen.

The British actor Henry Cavill - best known for playing Superman - will be an executive producer and has signed up to appear in the project.

Warhammer simulates battles between armies of miniature painted models.

The deal gives Amazon the rights to hire talent, and to make film and TV projects.

"Now comes the fun part: working out all the creative details with our partners and getting the first script written and into production. What Warhammer 40,000 stories should we tell first? Should we kick off with a movie or a TV show? Both?!" Games Workshop said in statement.

Games Workshop has enjoyed continued success after the pandemic, which saw sales of its toy figurines surge. Shares in the company rose after the deal was confirmed.

The announcement comes a year after the Nottingham-based company first said it was in talks to team up with Amazon's Prime Video service, also known for the series The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power, based on the fantasy novels of JRR Tolkien.

A team of screenwriters is currently being put together to bring the Warhammer universe to the screen, the company said on its community website.

The first Games Workshop store opened in Hammersmith in 1978 and began producing miniature wargaming models.

Over the decades Games Workshop has cultivated a fanbase of millions.

Collectors build large forces of miniature plastic gaming models, which can cost more than £100 each.

A miniature can be made up of hundreds of pieces which must be fitted together and then painted with colours such as "flesh" and "bone".

This can be used to play out clashes on a "tabletop" battlefield at home or at events, although some fans never play and instead compete to show off their creative versions of the models.

Millions of people around the world play Warhammer, and the worldwide "tabletop" games sector that the fantasy game is part of is worth around £8.6bn, according to the consumer data firm Statista, with new entrants able to raise funds from enthusiasts through platforms such as Kickstarter.

As well as greenlighting the production of Warhammer 40,000 films and TV series, the deal gives Amazon the option to license the rights to other Warhammer franchises further down the line.

Games Workshop will spend 12 months working with Amazon to agree "creative guidelines" for the films and series.

Production will only proceed once those guidelines are agreed.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-67753779
 
Just saw a Twitter user with the flags of the UK, Russia and Israel in his username.

Someone should make some sort of a record of these flag combinations
 
I totally fancied and gashed over malt extract which is back at the local mall.

It has a lot of vitamin B6 and I use it instead of sugar and sweeteners. No more than one table spoon per day though. To substitute sugar I also eat fruits with fructose/fruit sugar like very ripe bananas.

I usually do just fine without sugar, but on days when I need a lot of carbs, I eat beans and dates. Sometimes I mix honey with tea to get the sweet taste.
 

Attachments

  • malt.PNG
    malt.PNG
    65.9 KB · Views: 10
I've been watching episodes from the first 3 seasons of the tv series Bones, which aired 2005-2007. Something that I've been observing the last few years struck me again, while watching these episodes: I don't know if it's just me, but I can't tell recent decades apart in entertainment. Up through the late 1990s, I can tell more or less when a movie or tv show was made, just by looking at it. Movies and shows made in the last ~25 years are hard to tell apart. There are times when a movie or show made in 2023 is indistinguishable from a show made in 2013 or 2003. I can't discern fashions in clothing or hair, car designs, set designs, etc. Among the cast of Bones, only David Boreanaz is someone I'm familiar with, so these actors don't 'look young' to me, because I don't know them. The only thing that dates this show for me while I'm watching it is that people are using flip-phones and occasionally someone references MySpace.

It's kind of true of music, too, come to think of it. I can generally hear the differences in music from the 1920s to the 1990s, maybe stretching into the early 2000s. But lately I'm finding "new" music that, when I look, turns out to be 8, 10 or 12 years old. If I hear a song from the '60s, '70s or '80s that I've never heard before - and I do, a lot - I can sort of tell when it's from. There are songs I've heard from the last couple decades that are throwbacks to earlier eras and genres, and some of those have effectively tricked me into thinking they were older than they are. But while I can say that a particular song from the 2010s or 2020s sounds like it's from the 1970s, I can't tell that a song sounds like it's from the 2010s or 2020s, if you follow.
 
Hm, I think the 00s have a fairly unique look and feel to them, like the 90s and 80s. But I definitely agree about the 10s and 20s. I have no ability to guess when they are from.
 
Hm, I think the 00s have a fairly unique look and feel to them, like the 90s and 80s. But I definitely agree about the 10s and 20s. I have no ability to guess when they are from.
Yeah, these episodes of Bones I'm watching are 17 years old, and except for a few telltale details - like MySpace - I wouldn't be able to tell that they aren't contemporaneous with shows like The Rookie, Will Trent or The Lincoln Lawyer, which are from this year. Poker Face is explicitly an homage to older shows, like the above-mentioned bands that knowingly emulate music styles from past decades. East New York really seemed to me like a deliberate homage to older American cop shows, but it was never explicit (except in one scene when one of the characters references NYPD Blue while in the presence of Jimmy Smits' character and he kind of pauses and glances at them over his shoulder, like his ears were burning - then, I knew that they knew).

I don't know if this is just me, or something about pop culture today.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom