There are a lot of disillusioned fans and writers on FB now, and lots of discussions got shut down because they were getting really vitriolic.
Some of the discussions were on the issue of "separating the art from the artist" and whether it's possible to enjoy the art when the artist turns out to be thoroughly nasty.
I don't have that problem with Gaiman because I never read anything of his. All I know about him comes from decades'-old interviews on a Canadian science fiction show called Prisoners of Gravity.
I get a lot of flak for still reading and enjoying the Darkover books and the Avalon books by Marion Zimmer Bradley. Yes, I'm aware of what she was accused of and why her husband ended up in prison. Does that mean I'm going to put her books and everything I have that's based on them on a bonfire? No. I divorce the art from the artist, and that's my right as a fan to make that decision.
If we only read stuff written by perfect saints, we'd never read anything at all, because no writer in the history of the human species has ever been perfect.
Some of the discussions were on the issue of "separating the art from the artist" and whether it's possible to enjoy the art when the artist turns out to be thoroughly nasty.
I don't have that problem with Gaiman because I never read anything of his. All I know about him comes from decades'-old interviews on a Canadian science fiction show called Prisoners of Gravity.
I get a lot of flak for still reading and enjoying the Darkover books and the Avalon books by Marion Zimmer Bradley. Yes, I'm aware of what she was accused of and why her husband ended up in prison. Does that mean I'm going to put her books and everything I have that's based on them on a bonfire? No. I divorce the art from the artist, and that's my right as a fan to make that decision.
If we only read stuff written by perfect saints, we'd never read anything at all, because no writer in the history of the human species has ever been perfect.