Realpolitik CIV - An Interactive AAR

Status
Not open for further replies.
I oppose slavery. I have no problem with indentured servitude, but I will vote down any measure to make people like animals. I support the slaves right to FREEDOM!

:wallbash:

Anyway, to respond to Cull: The issue I've been having is that some people have been advocating an army of nothing but Swordsmen. They are strong, yes, but Civ tends to reward a mix of units. Personally, I wouldn't waste a Catapult against an Axeman just to give the Sword better odds (it sounded like you were talking about a field battle, but that might not be what you meant). I think another reason I don't favor Swordsmen as much as I used to is because I've played a bit more against humans, who favor Axemen, so I'm not longer in the habit of making as many Swordsmen unless I plan to go City Raiding.

Your offensive stack is much better, but don't forget the Axemen! Chariots do not get their bonus against Axemen while defending.
 
Your not at war with me in IOT!

If I don't respond, automatically vote me with Ilduce. I will be active, but when I am not, use this as a blanket rule.

this is not allowed,you have to vote for yourself(to my understanding)

LH,can you clarify?

Anyway, to respond to Cull: The issue I've been having is that some people have been advocating an army of nothing but Swordsmen. They are strong, yes, but Civ tends to reward a mix of units. Personally, I wouldn't waste a Catapult against an Axeman just to give the Sword better odds (it sounded like you were talking about a field battle, but that might not be what you meant). I think another reason I don't favor Swordsmen as much as I used to is because I've played a bit more against humans, who favor Axemen, so I'm not longer in the habit of making as many Swordsmen unless I plan to go City Raiding.

Your offensive stack is much better, but don't forget the Axemen! Chariots do not get their bonus against Axemen while defending.

balanced units is key.if this was the Modern age,there'd be no question about having Artillery,Tanks and Infantry,+AA and air support.this should not even be a question(I would use the Catapult,btw,but only if it was really important)

OK - here's what happened there.

Ravus wanted to do that and sent me the writing piece. I recognized the error in the slavery thing but didn't want to mess with it - assume this is a flashback.

I removed Buddhism from every English city and added Christianity to London and New Horizons in addition to Ravus-York.

Everything beyond Ravus' incarceration was added by me.

- Lighthearter

ah,flashbacks.I remember those little buggers,I have a few slow motion shots of that time I danced with Lady Elizabeth,sigh... ;) :P
 
You have two votes, so you he can do that.

I could've clarified.what I meant is that we can't just set him to automatically vote for Ilduce's stuff,he has to come in and post it.
 
I oppose slavery. I have no problem with indentured servitude, but I will vote down any measure to make people like animals. I support the slaves right to FREEDOM!

Okay the opposition is already killing me with stress on responding to this thing with the same response over and over. Your in my coalition. At least read the argfuements on previous pages to understand what we are talking about.

Didnt LH just ban this topic? Anyway let me explain (This is an explanation so that dominatiuon doesnt have to read all the other pages if he doesnt want too. This is not open for comments from the opposition to start another heated arguement.)

'Slavery' is a term used in the game. Alot of people have sterotypes associated with that word. The civil war in the usa always seems to people the war that banished slavery, yada yada. They also seem to think that the slavery practiced there was the only kind of slavery ever used. But they are wrong.

'Slavery' has been used for the past couple millennia. It can involve anything from POWs worked after a war, an african tribe taking another one in a war and using them as slaves, and so on. Some times, slavery is instituted like it was in the south (usa) and the children of slaves became slaves as well. Alot of the time (but not always) they were treated barbarically, and very badly. Their masters could do whatever they want to them. It never stopped because their children grew up like that too. It became hereditary.

This is not what we are talking about. 'Slavery' is a term in the game. There is no game function to represent paroles, immigration, or indentured servants as you call them. It is all classified under slavery. Slavery in this case, is like an indentured servant. they do jobs for an amount of time, (like building a library) and they get some kind of reward, like being free, or i suggested they immigrate to ireland where the anscestors of law breakers went when Cull banished them.

What we have been saying, is that we take people who have commited serious crimes, and let them work on community projects, or whatever else is being worked on in the city at that time. They get it dont faster. Some go free. Others immigrate to new horizons to start a new life. Other people are used as well. Immigrants, can become 'slves' as the game calls them, and earn their citizenship. Illegal immigrants can also do this when they are caught, instead of being dumped in the channel.

Like Whosit and MN have already displayed, there is no accurate way to use this kind of method OOC and come out with the in-game affects like the loss of so much POP. MN says this signifies that so much of our POP is slaves, and that cant be true. Meanwhile Whosit showed that nothing we can use to explain slavery, can be used to explain the huge loss of POP in the game.

We are not using slavery to 'work people like animals' as you say. Its more liek what i would call 'community service' that would be required for various things as i have pointed out or, as you call the idea 'indentured servants'. The ideas are very simliar.

-----------------End of slavery talk please-------------------

Ilduce: I meant that I PERSONALLY was right wing in RL. The party i belong to here is centrist. Thats how i see it as well.
 
WHAT THE CRAP????? :mad: :p

Let me read through all of this again. Then I'll post my thoughts.
 
Ravus nodded, having obviously considered this all himself. “Obviously their will be laws against damaging our nations servants, whether physically or mentally. Any damage to a servant and you yourself will become a servant.

Ravus, you are very wise. That is, indeed, a good idea. I realize (after doing a bunch of research about slavery last night) that a lot of what we think of when we say "slavery" is a stereotype.

GET ATHERS AND RAVUS BACK IMMEDIATELY. They must be peacefully situated, and both the opposition and administration MUST sort out this whole thing out TOGETHER and figure out all of their reasons.

If I promise not to cause trouble, may I aid the administration in rescue efforts?

And wait, did the Buddhist dudes agree to be servants?
 
Ravus, you are very wise. That is, indeed, a good idea. I realize (after doing a bunch of research about slavery last night) that a lot of what we think of when we say "slavery" is a stereotype.

Yay for research! I'm so proud of you. :goodjob:

GET ATHERS AND RAVUS BACK IMMEDIATELY. They must be peacefully situated, and both the opposition and administration MUST sort out this whole thing out TOGETHER and figure out all of their reasons.

If I promise not to cause trouble, may I aid the administration in rescue efforts?

Speaking personally, I think that this would be excellent. I think that it would be in everyone's best interest for the Monks and Eagles to be on our side, considering the amount of kick-ass that they represent.

And wait, did the Buddhist dudes agree to be servants?

I think that they either agreed to be servants, or "served their nation" in a more permanent fashion. :mischief:
 
So the opposition doesnt demand that we repeal slavery anymore after the research? Im just asking.

But what do you mean by rescue efforts? There is nobody to rescue. I have already stated my intention to give athers a promotion, expand the funding of the night eagles (thats a new one), and get Ravus back. It is his decision whether we adopt christianity right away though. I think we all know the pros and cons of it by now.

Actually the buddhist dudes in 'liverpool' were killed by the monks. Some badass monks alright.

MN you wouldnt mind sharing your research with WIM would you? Hopefully we can all get along with this slavery thing.
 
It depends on whether or not the Buddhists were forced.

And please, before we get start giving promotions and death sentences, could we all just ask Ravus and Athers some questions about why they did what they did?
 
It depends on whether or not the Buddhists were forced.

And please, before we get start giving promotions and death sentences, could we all just ask Ravus and Athers some questions about why they did what they did?

this is sound.I think they may have done the right thing,but we should get them and ask those questions.the only thing up in the air is finding the Night Eagles,in the Budget Line or elsewhere *shrugs* I sure have no idea where they hang out
 
The buddhists did not work as slaves. Ravus and the monks killed them. At least thats what i agthered from teh peace. he gave them the choice to either leave (permanently) or work as slaves.

THIS WAS NOT THE ADMINISTRATIONS CHOICE. We did not try to force them to work. We had nothing to do with what the monks did. I support their intentions, and i even believe what they did was for the best. We needed a wake up call here.

We already know why they did these things. It is EXPLAINED RIGHT IN THE PIECE OF WRITING. Please read it again.
 
Well, i would have rathered that they didnt actually KILL them, but for all we knew, they could have been russian spies and Ravus could have found out about it. Who knows. We just have to wait for Ravus to Unlurk again for an answer.

The buddhists are our enemy (in the game). Why should we be sorry to see violent protestors outside a meeting being dispatched? I guess you can call me nuetral on the issue. I have mixed opinions here. He had the right intentions, and used a forceful way to get our attention and stop bickering among ourselves.

Dont you think that we DID need a wake up call from all this arguing?

EDIT: WIM stop taking my words out of context.
 
Again, the opinions of the administration doesn't represent the opinions of the president.

Um, do you mean that "the opinions of the president do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the administration?" :confused:

Either way, we need to reestablish formal contact with Ravus and the Night Eagles and get this sorted out in a calm, rational manner (should that be possible).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom