Realpolitik CIV - An Interactive AAR

Status
Not open for further replies.
I honestly think you're a troll. Or at least seombody's on your account and trolling for you due to the whole building things that look good stuff.

You said something about 1800ish you don't finish the tech tree, and don't have 300+ gold at 100% science. My family calls that a Monarch/Emperor, play-to-win, no WBed AT ALL, culture win.

MathNerd, do you support Pacifism RIGHT NOW?

And in late game, when you have all the space race parts, building wealth in small cities, and in high cities building space parts, going over now-almost-useless towns for the late-game Caste System State Property workshop is very useful.
 
ATM, I think Pacifism isn't needed. We don't really have much of a specialist economy, so no, I don't support the in game Pacifism civic.
 
You said something about 1800ish you don't finish the tech tree, and don't have 300+ gold at 100% science. My family calls that a Monarch/Emperor, play-to-win, no WBed AT ALL, culture win.

Thats not counting building wealth in cities. Have you done that on Monarch/Emperor, while spending the time to build all the useless wonders? I have (once on monarch)

MathNerd, do you support Pacifism RIGHT NOW?
He is a member of one of the 3 more pacifist parties, he should support it.

honestly think you're a troll. Or at least seombody's on your account and trolling for you due to the whole building things that look good stuff.
How is that trolling?

And in late game, when you have all the space race parts, building wealth in small cities, and in high cities building space parts, going over now-almost-useless towns for the late-game Caste System State Property workshop is very useful.
Nah, Workshops just kill population (with there -1 food on the plot) state property Sucks for being communist and Caste system sucks for the unhappiness it gives (+5 :mad: for we demand emancipation).
Also why build wealth in cities? I build either buildings or research, you don't need wealth when you making 300+gpt on 100% science.
 
Usually, I would, since my party is pacifist, but in game, I don't think that the Pacifism civic is really that useful right now for us. Extra GP is awesome when we actually are running specialists.
 
OK, I wanted to stay out of this, but I have to echo Ravus in saying "stop this pointless debate."

Ilduce: I recognize that you have your own way of playing, and that you play Civ to have fun your own way. That's fine. However, you also have to realize that the rest of us do not agree with your play philosophy, so when we are deciding how to proceed in this game, we are not likely to support your methods.

Everyone else: Ilduce plays to have fun his own way. That is fine. As we're deciding what to do, we simply consider his ideas on their own merit. If we find that they will not assist us in our current situation, we will do something else.

Right now, we need to clearly identify the problems with our nation so that we can devise solutions that will actually work, rather than patch over the symptoms.

Lighthearter: We will probably be asking you for more screen shots, so you may want to start collecting them. :p City screen shots, financial screen, trade screen, diplo screen, and the like seem like a good place to start.
 
Usually, I would, since my party is pacifist, but in game, I don't think that the Pacifism civic is really that useful right now for us. Extra GP is awesome when we actually are running specialists.
Cottages and specialists is all I run in cities in my games. So I guess pacifism is really useful. Also philosophical is my second favorite trait. Also Whosit wants us to start using specailists. I think pacifism is awsome and we need it.

Also you had a huge debate on the morality of slavery. Start using your RL morals to influence your civics in game again.

Edit Xpost

Ilduce: I recognize that you have your own way of playing, and that you play Civ to have fun your own way. That's fine. However, you also have to realize that the rest of us do not agree with your play philosophy, so when we are deciding how to proceed in this game, we are not likely to support your methods.
I never expected that. but I have the right to defend myself when attacked.

Everyone else: Ilduce plays to have fun his own way. That is fine. As we're deciding what to do, we simply consider his ideas on their own merit. If we find that they will not assist us in our current situation, we will do something else.

I support that, as long as its not Arya who doesn't do any of my suggestions. In most cases my suggestions will actually work.

Right now, we need to clearly identify the problems with our nation so that we can devise solutions that will actually work, rather than patch over the symptoms.

I will be agreeing with you alot in this post

Lighthearter: We will probably be asking you for more screen shots, so you may want to start collecting them. City screen shots, financial screen, trade screen, diplo screen, and the like seem like a good place to start.
I have sent him 2 pms to remind him this needs to be done. yesterday he said he would post them soon.
 
@CelticFury:
Join the glorious Liberal Marxist Party! Fight for equality for all! Fight for economic democracy! Also, our logo is easily the coolest.
 
Cottages and specialists is all I run in cities in my games. So I guess pacifism is really useful. Also philosophical is my second favorite trait. Also Whosit wants us to start using specailists. I think pacifism is awsome and we need it.

Also you had a huge debate on the morality of slavery. Start using your RL morals to influence your civics in game again.

Pacifism is one of those civics that has situational usefulness. And arguing whether or not to adopt it now is pointless because we don't even have the requisite tech. I would argue strongly against adopting it, anyway, because we are going to have to field a substantial army just to defend ourselves from the technologically superior AI, as well as from LH's random events.

As for real-life morality... LH seemed to get a bit annoyed at that. And I'm not playing as a character who's as concerned with such things. :mischief:

Edit: Suppose I should get on the bandwagon...

Join the illustrious Imperial Party, and do your part to make England the strongest and most prosperous nation on the face of the earth! Other nations shall kneel before our glory!
 
To all the recruiters: I thank you for your invitations, but for now, I'd like to stay an independent.

Now, before I dive into the fray, I have a couple questions.

1. Are there any restrictions on my voting in the elections other than those posted on the front page? The reason I ask is because I thought I had seen a post somewhere restricting new players from jumping in and voting in the middle of an election.

2. Has the Unity Coalition been put into effect yet, or do the old ones still stand?
 
1. No. That rule was dismissed.

2. Unity Coalition has been put into effect. The NPP is part of it. We would like to propose MATHNERD or WHOSIT or RAVUS or WIM to president candidate for Unity.

I myself would like either foriegn minister, governor, or economic minister.
 
I'll grant you that.

Also would you consider making the PCE a logo?

No problem. Just send me a Pm with some details and we'll hammer it out.

To all the recruiters: I thank you for your invitations, but for now, I'd like to stay an independent.

Now, before I dive into the fray, I have a couple questions.

1. Are there any restrictions on my voting in the elections other than those posted on the front page? The reason I ask is because I thought I had seen a post somewhere restricting new players from jumping in and voting in the middle of an election.

2. Has the Unity Coalition been put into effect yet, or do the old ones still stand?

1) There are no restrictions. New and swing voters often have a large impact on elections, as do lurkers.

2) I think so, not sure. The parties involved are engaged in negotiations I think though.

XPOST with Cull. Stupid Ninja cross-posting powers.
 
Unity Coalition has been put into effect. The NPP is part of it. We would like to propose MATHNERD or WHOSIT or RAVUS or WIM to president candidate for Unity.

I myself would like either foriegn minister, governor, or economic minister.

I would support MN or WIM

Also I would like to be interior
 
I can accept that. I do wish that Ravus, that old grizzled monk, over MathNerd, but as Ravus is usually reluctant to even get an offical government posistion, I support MathNerd.

MATHNERD FOR PRESIDENT! WHOSIT FOR VICE-PRESIDENT! CULL FOR FOREIGN, FINANCIAL, OR GOVERNOR!
 
Oh, yeah! I forgot about that third vote. Hmm....

Well, LH usually votes neutrally, so probably LMP, Arya, and Unity, but then again, LH is known to be unpredictable as well. :p

EDIT: X-post

If I'm Prez, who else would like a Post? I am considering to keep posts open for even non-admin members.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom