Nukeknockout
Rusty Hinge
Well, it's all about convincing people to buy the darn LT. and against infantry, larger, slower vehicles are more likely to be hit by rockets or, say, Grenades.
The main problem I can see is that the Ranger is still totally useless, cost for cost. It's going to get smacked down by the 4 Grenadiers it'll wind up facing. It's also obsoleted by the LT with just an extra $15, so yeah.
How about reducing it's cost to, say, $40? Basically making it a Pillbox on wheels?
@L: The reason the artillery shouldn't get a Free Strike is: it gains +15% vs BOTH Infantry and Vehicles. The other reason is that doing so obsoletes the AT Minelayer, which has +15% vs vehicles and a first strike.
Sonereal: That speed thing looks awesome. That can finally justify vehicle cost as compared to infantry.
The main problem I can see is that the Ranger is still totally useless, cost for cost. It's going to get smacked down by the 4 Grenadiers it'll wind up facing. It's also obsoleted by the LT with just an extra $15, so yeah.
How about reducing it's cost to, say, $40? Basically making it a Pillbox on wheels?
@L: The reason the artillery shouldn't get a Free Strike is: it gains +15% vs BOTH Infantry and Vehicles. The other reason is that doing so obsoletes the AT Minelayer, which has +15% vs vehicles and a first strike.
Sonereal: That speed thing looks awesome. That can finally justify vehicle cost as compared to infantry.