Balance was ok. Stability didnt seem to be different from standard RFC.
Something i noted was that in the monarch game i played, i was well ahead in tech around 1700 compared to reality, but then started to slow down, and finaly finish the tech tree around 2015. Even though i was teching like crazy.
A reason for this might be that i was hit hard by the plague around 1700 and again around 1900. Not only was a good chunk of my population killed both times, even though my cities was generally pretty healthy. But the worst thing was that all my towns was both time reduced to cottages/hamlets, which had a really severe impact on the economy. (my economy was mostly cottage based)
A sideeffect of this is that universal suffrage civic becomes alot worse than in a regular game. I would even say that its not worth getting untill you have been hit by the last plague (in ~1850), since the amount of turns that you have towns are much fewer than it should be. Not switching to US will ofc give you some stability problems, and becourse of this alone i think its worth considering of the plague should be as severe as it is now.
Even though i felt i was hit hard by the plague, it was much worse for the AI. I looked at the AI civs after both the late plagues (in the worldbuilder), and alot of AI cities had been reduced to size 1.
The only current plague effect that imo is near a realistic level is the one representic the black death around 1350. The later ones are way to strong imo.
Even though the spanish flu killed around 75 mil, that was still only a few percentage of world population at that time.
Something i noted was that in the monarch game i played, i was well ahead in tech around 1700 compared to reality, but then started to slow down, and finaly finish the tech tree around 2015. Even though i was teching like crazy.
A reason for this might be that i was hit hard by the plague around 1700 and again around 1900. Not only was a good chunk of my population killed both times, even though my cities was generally pretty healthy. But the worst thing was that all my towns was both time reduced to cottages/hamlets, which had a really severe impact on the economy. (my economy was mostly cottage based)
A sideeffect of this is that universal suffrage civic becomes alot worse than in a regular game. I would even say that its not worth getting untill you have been hit by the last plague (in ~1850), since the amount of turns that you have towns are much fewer than it should be. Not switching to US will ofc give you some stability problems, and becourse of this alone i think its worth considering of the plague should be as severe as it is now.
Even though i felt i was hit hard by the plague, it was much worse for the AI. I looked at the AI civs after both the late plagues (in the worldbuilder), and alot of AI cities had been reduced to size 1.
The only current plague effect that imo is near a realistic level is the one representic the black death around 1350. The later ones are way to strong imo.
Even though the spanish flu killed around 75 mil, that was still only a few percentage of world population at that time.