Rice snubs Ahmadinejad at UN!

Bast

Protector of Cats
Joined
Jun 9, 2004
Messages
6,230
Location
Sydney, Australia
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, right, walks right past Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, lower left, to her seat, prior to President Bush's remarks to the United Nations General Assembly, Tuesday, Sept. 23, 2008, in New York. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)

ALeqM5jtk3gTd-tiido7gODE1-SWISjitA


Tough week for Rice at UN

By MATTHEW LEE – 19 hours ago

NEW YORK (AP) — Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice made the best Monday of U.S. failure to win new U.N. punishments against Iran, a disappointment to the Bush administration that marked the nadir of a grueling week at the United Nations, where U.S. prestige and influence took a beating at the hands of Russia, Iran and North Korea.

"I think it is a very positive step, the resolution on Iran," Rice said before a meeting with Kazakhstan's foreign minister. "We had only sought a resolution that would affirm the unity," of the nations that have offered Iran potential trade, economic and other perks in exchange for rolling back its disputed nuclear program, Rice said.

That way, Rice said, "The Iranians know that this unity is very strong and that we will be moving forward."

Unity among the six nations extended only to a restatement of past agreements, however. Even that modest outcome from last week had been in doubt as, in the midst of a global financial crisis blamed by some on the United States and problems with key anti-terror ally Pakistan, Rice spent eight days here trying to resurrect many of the waning Bush administration's most important foreign policy goals.

Russia, irate at criticism for its war with Georgia, stymied U.S. hopes to have the U.N. Security Council begin drafting new Iran sanctions.

On the positive side, Rice's intense long-distance lobbying of lawmakers in Washington achieved a major breakthrough in Congress on the administration's civilian nuclear deal with India.

At the same time, however:

_North Korea expelled U.N. atomic inspectors and said it would shortly restart a nuclear reactor it had disabled under faltering international talks to get it to give up the bomb. The chief U.S. negotiator is to visit Pyongyang this week in a bid to salvage the process.

_Pakistan insisted on respect for its sovereignty at the U.N. as its military launched warning shots or flares at two American choppers near the Afghan-Pakistan border, prompting an exchange of fire between a joint U.S.-Afghan patrol and Pakistani troops on the ground below.

Attending her final U.N. General Assembly session as America's top diplomat, Rice held more than 80 meetings with world leaders and senior officials but perhaps none was more closely watched than her encounter on Wednesday with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov.

In their first face-to-face discussion since Russia invaded pro-Western Georgia last month, Rice and Lavrov appeared to agree on little. One U.S. official who sat in, Daniel Fried, described it as "a polite, thorough exchange of views where the disagreements were quite clear."

And those disagreements extended beyond Georgia.

Russia, a permanent member of the U.N. Security Council, announced even before the Rice-Lavrov session that it would not attend a planned ministerial-level meeting with the other four permanent council members on Iran, forcing its cancellation.

The United States and Europe had sought the meeting to show unity in their desire to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons and start drafting new sanctions. Russia then cemented its diplomatic victory by agreeing to a new U.N. resolution that maintains only the status quo.

The same day the watered-down resolution passed, Lavrov took to the floor of the General Assembly to denounce the domination of world affairs after the promise of global post-9/11 unity by a single power — a veiled reference to the United States.

"The solidarity of the international community fostered on the wave of struggle against terrorism turned out to be somehow 'privatized,'" Lavrov said.

He cited the U.S. invasion of Iraq "under the false pretext of fight on terror and nuclear arms proliferation" and questions of excessive use of force against civilians in counterterrorism operations in Afghanistan.

Source: http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5i2Wcc4CXl8ea-Cu2TRCgQTjOq_9AD93GGKPG0

Thoughts? Condi is so inspirational. She's going to be missed when she goes back to Stanford.
 
Screw the UN (and Putin), she should have slapped that little ooga-booga mouthpiece troll.
 
Bast, I honestly, hand on my heart dont mean this as trolling but is there any powerful female you dont admire?
 
And he wanted to prove that he was a maverick, that he would bring someone from outside the good ole boys. Rice is a good ole boy, if you know what I mean. She's a hat from yee-haw diplomacy and would be tantamount to Cheney (ignoring the haliburton, just ideology).

I'd vote her for pres.

@ RRW

Can I answer? No. I l0ve me some powerful woman. I'm not the big dumb farmgirl using a lawnmower type. That was the funniest pic I've seen in so long. I surely hope you were not serious.
 
And he wanted to prove that he was a maverick, that he would bring someone from outside the good ole boys. Rice is a good ole boy, if you know what I mean. She's a hat from yee-haw diplomacy and would be tantamount to Cheney (ignoring the haliburton, just ideology).

I'd vote her for pres.

@ RRW

Can I answer? No. I l0ve me some powerful woman. Is there anything sexier?

Yeah there is, sexy women. some powerful women are sexy, some arent. Status does nothing for me on its own. but I literally cant remember Bast ever not admiring any powerful woman
 
It's not status. It's success in male dominated world. That takes some personal fortitude. And money does not equal power. If Cindy lost John, I wouldn't be as interested. Of course, I would not do anything without his permission.

If you were serious about that farm girl with lawnmower pic, you REALLY need to not get married anytime soon, because you are not dumb enough to respect that. If I can't respect someone, they aren't sexy in any meaningful sense.

I've seen a few pics of Condi that I was like "oh yea".
 
It's not status. It's success in male dominated world. That takes some personal fortitude. And money does not equal power. If Cindy lost John, I wouldn't be as interested. Of course, I would not do anything without his permission.

If you were serious about that farm girl with lawnmower pic, you REALLY need to not get married anytime soon, because you are not dumb enough to respect that. If I can't respect someone, they aren't sexy in any meaningful sense.


I already am married, and I like big butts and cannot lie. thats one of the things I like, power is one of yours. Usually thats what attracts women, but for you it does it. Dosent melt my butter though. then again, you are a total fruitcake and nothing about you would surprise me
 
I like big butts and cannot lie. thats one of the things I like, power is one of yours.

I never said you were an intellectual, but you're smart so it is ok. Long live Sir Mixalot (at least he was a capitalist).
 
Bast, I honestly, hand on my heart dont mean this as trolling but is there any powerful female you dont admire?

Margaret Thatcher? :lol:

Well my favourite fictional heroine is Scarlett O'Hara and yes I do admire a lot of powerful female historical figures but power alone isn't enough.
 
Margaret Thatcher? :lol:

Well my favourite fictional heroine is Scarlett O'Hara and yes I do admire a lot of powerful female historical figures but power alone isn't enough.

OK, you arent all bad in that case...
 
I bet she was thinking "B1tch please, I ain't even LOOKIN' at that mofo."
 
It appears Ahmadinejad had a translator on (in the picture). It's perfectly possible Ahmadinejad was busy and Rice knew well enough not to bother Ahmadinejad despite the possible event that everything she does is being recorded.
 
Does she usually stop for a chat and a cup of tea?
 
If only McCain had picked her as veep. :(

But too close associations with Bush I guess.

Guessing is all we can do on regarding the McCain Campaign. It is odd to me that if they did want a woman veep alongside McCain, then Rice would definitely be a better choice than a nobody like Palin. WTH?

My guess is that maybe the McCain Campaign strategists really know what they are doing by selecting someone who is inexperienced because they know very well that the American people are totally idiots; also, they are the same strategists from the Bush Campaign that use the same tactics against McCain awhile back. So it make no difference on Rice being closely associated with Bush. Time to watch "Idiocracy" one more time....
 
Why is this a news worthy story? Seems like tabloid hooey to me.
 
Why is this a news worthy story? Seems like tabloid hooey to me.

You are probably right, this can be trivial as most tabloid stuff are. But you have to at least consider that the photo itself, can be a symbolic representation of the Bush Administration's continuing failure to appear as people who engage in foreign policy by the slogan "diplomacy first" before any act of aggression that they are well known for.
 
Why shouldn't she snub him? Is there any particular reason at all that we should have direct contact with a megalomaniac who was involved in holding our citizens hostage on our own sovereign territory almost 30 years ago and then somehow came to lead that nation?

If she did anything, she should have gone over and punched him in the nuts.
 
Back
Top Bottom