[R&F] Rise and Fall General Discussion Thread
- Thread starter bite
- Start date
Are you familiar with 'Unity of Command'? Something like that, suitably adapted, could even work in Civ.
I always wanted for certain terrain types, like deserts and jungles, to erode unit strength, and for mounted units to lose strength away from grazing land. However, the AI would suffer unto death.
Curiously the closest we have ever got to this system was way back when triremes could sink if they ended their move way offshore. Oh, and Carthage's special ability in 5.
Leyrann
Deity
It's the basis of the Gedemon's Civilization mod. Which is shaping up to be awesome.
Trengilly
Warlord
The AI can barely handle 1 UPT and now you want it to handle attrition and supply logistics? Oy vey!
Considering he failed to conquer India because his troops refused to go any farther...Alexander might not agree with you
Army size varied due to population more than anything. Warmer climes of course could support bigger populations and bigger armies.
Alexander's Hetaroi
Deity
To be fair the more you went east, the more war elephants kept popping up in the armies.Considering he failed to conquer India because his troops refused to go any farther...
Curse those varu.To be fair the more you went east, the more war elephants kept popping up in the armies.
God of Kings
Ruler of all heads of state
It would be interesting to place each of the new leaders we know so far into something like the D&D alignment chart.
I can see Shaka, Chandragupta, and Genghis Khan being evil, given that they're warmongers. Poundmaker may end up being Lawful Good, given how much he values lasting alliances.
I can see Shaka, Chandragupta, and Genghis Khan being evil, given that they're warmongers. Poundmaker may end up being Lawful Good, given how much he values lasting alliances.
Leyrann
Deity
Where do we put Mvemba, Pedro and Qin Shi Huang?
God of Kings
Ruler of all heads of state
I meant for R&F leaders; vanilla leaders would have a different set.
@God of Kings, Wilhelmina clearly has to be somewhere in the Good part
Lawful neutral. Or even Chaotic neutral.@God of Kings, Wilhelmina clearly has to be somewhere in the Good part
Tamar is probably chaotic as well.
King William I
King
Lawful Good - Robert the Bruce
Neutral Good - Wilhelmina
Chaotic Good - Tamar
Lawful Neutral - Poundmaker
True Neutral - Seonduk
Chaotic Neutral -
Lawful Evil - Chandragupta
Neutral Evil - Genghis Khan
Chaotic Evil - Shaka
Neutral Good - Wilhelmina
Chaotic Good - Tamar
Lawful Neutral - Poundmaker
True Neutral - Seonduk
Chaotic Neutral -
Lawful Evil - Chandragupta
Neutral Evil - Genghis Khan
Chaotic Evil - Shaka
Boris Gudenuf
Deity
Considering he failed to conquer India because his troops refused to go any farther...
Ah, but that was a failure of Morale, not of Supply. According to D. W. Engel's Alexander the Great and the Logistics of the Macedonian Army (1978, U. of California Press) he was supplying over 62,000 men in India without major problems in keeping them and their horses fed, and even supplying replacement armor and equipment. I suspect having 'liberated' several hundred tons of gold from the Persian Treasury helped: when you can pay in good hard coin a lot of local people will be more than happy to supply you...
Nonsense. Wilhelmina is Lawful Adorable.
You made a typo, should be Victoria
No, she's definitely chaotic evil. And ugly. And has major clipping in her animations.
The tantrum she throws when she denounces you is kind of cute, though.
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2011
- Messages
- 11,901
One suspect that behaviour is chaotic good, one clearly was not understand what she was feeling at the time is all. As for ugly, One is now denounced you you you fiend!
