nzcamel
Nahtanoj the Magnificent
Hmm, does somebody care to make a features thread ? I'd do it, but I don't want the responsibility to regularly edit and upgade it...
It's pinned by Bite.
Ugh... weren't BNW and G&K less initially?
Were they? i only got them long after the game was released on special. I seem to remember the expansions to IV costing a similar amount to the base game on release; so this feels cheap to me.
Has anyone considered this comment
"You will watch others buckle under their own weight"
Big empires perhaps getting a negative
They better freaken not! Though I'm good with culture flipping.
Cool, but no UN?
edit: or did I miss it?
I think it's there just in a different guise... "emergency" UN came too late in V
Nope. No U.N./World Congress.
Probably it will be difficult to maintain loyalty on the fringes.
If only that meant such possible scenarios, where Trajan, for example, overextends and sees his empire to fragment into France and Spain... Or England overcolonizes a bit and sees (well, predictably) America to split off. Or some civil war mechanics, where a country splits and the alternative ruler is put in power in the separatist region (where there are two leaders). Or something similar
I'd like to see something along those lines...
onestly as far as fame goes they are pretty much equal, you of course can maybe be biased as indonesia was a dutch colony, i from europe, see the celts as an important classical civilisation and the dutch as an important modern trading and colonial powerhouse
The Celts were never a unified Civilization.
Cultural loyalty is a good addition and may mean the death of forward settling, as nobody could forward settle easily in civ 4 randomly without losing a city.
It will certainly not be missed,
Yeah, they better completely retool that stupid forward settling imperative that the AI has!