I would argue Carthage is neither. They are from the ancient Middle East.People wail on about how Carthage is not part of Africa or how they are European.
Its not the Zulus that are particularly a problem.
It is the Zulus before more worldly civs like Ghana/Mali/Songhai, Ethiopia/Axum, and Swahili/Kilwa.
I always thought of the Zulus as a 2nd Expansion Civ, not a 1st. I'm not familiar enough with Civ3 and Civ4 to know if that was the case.
I... Must... Not... Be... A... Grammar... Nazi...They’re musics gonna rock. They’re city names are making a return.
I never laughed so much! My imagination is always so vivid I just can't help but picturing playing this in the background as Shaka and his Zulu army walks into battle conquering everyone with ease. The "You're in love with me" just seems to perfect for Shaka in accordance with this forum's opinion of him.I guess it's only me then, that there is only song that comes to my head every time I meet him in game.
Always good to double Czech.I... Must... Not... Be... A... Grammar... Nazi...
Sorry about that, I just something like to nitpick and annoy people with little thingsEven if I'm not native English speaker, just a 16 years old Czech person still learning English. I also make mistakes
![]()
Won't be the last either. Anyway second is the best.
I'm surprised the general opinion on the Zulu's music is positive. I disliked their theme in V. It seemed corny. OooOOOoooh Shaka! OOOOoooOOOh Shaa-aa-kaaa!
That theme was composed by Michael Curran, who is not working for Firaxis anymore. So maybe Geoff Knorr or Roland Rizzo composed a Zulu theme more to you liking?![]()
Agreed. I really didn't like it either.I'm surprised the general opinion on the Zulu's music is positive. I disliked their theme in V. It seemed corny. OooOOOoooh Shaka! OOOOoooOOOh Shaa-aa-kaaa!
Does a diplomatic victory not have a clear gameplay spot? A World Congress would give us a good reason to cultivate good relationships with other Civs. It would gives us something to do late game other than steam rolling cities or clicking Next Turn while waiting for tourism or research buckets to fill. It could open the door for new and interesting unique and leader abilities. And it would give peaceful players a means of dealing with problematic Civs (I'm looking at you, Pedro) without resorting to waging war against an AI that's ill equipped to fight back. A diplomatic victory, in my humble opinion, is exactly what this game needs in the next expansion.
I agree, given that domination is a bit overpowered in 6, a diplomatic victory would give players and AI an incentive to maintain peaceful relationships.
However, I also agree that the diplo victory in 5 was donkey doodoo, so I wouldn't want them to include one unless they implemented it with more thought.
I mean he's replacing Boudicca as the nominal Celtic leader, so he's keeping the tradition aliveI don't have anything against the portrayal of the Civ itself, but William Wallace would work better as a Great General. At least make the leader Robert the Bruce, an actual king of Scotland, and he would still probably have the same agenda and ability that William Wallace would.
"The most notable fact of all is that the name “Brave Heart” actually refers to Robert the Bruce and not William Wallace. After his death, Robert’s heart was literally carried into battle, giving birth to the nickname."I keep asking myself why everybody presumes it's William Wallace who will lead Scotland.
Brave Heart which is the clue that the Chinese Translator/Fact Checker dropped was the nickname for Robert the Bruce not William Wallace, even if the movie makes you think so.
As his job was to check the Chinese translation of the original English text I guess Firaxis would have the facts straight in the Civilopedia (I hope).