Actually, I'm not so sure about this. Russia is supposed to have 8,000 nuke heads (with almost half who don't work anymore), and China has 500 nuke heads. Considering that Chinese population is 10 times larger, I would bet there would be more Chinese surviving than Russians.calgacus said:I don't think there's any question that Russia would win if nuclear weapons became involved.
Chinese nukes probably aren't of the best quality either.
Pasi Nurminen said:Russia still has a massive military, and has proven time and again, that when invaded, it can and will resist the intruders at any cost. No nation could take down Russia, not ever, and certainly not now. Even the Americans would have their asses handed to them.
Yom said:so the Russian government would have a hard time keeping the nation together and fighting an effective war.
calgacus said:75-80% of Russians live in Europe. The only significant population center which would be easily accesible to China is Vladivostok. The Chinese would have to cover 4 times the distance as the crow flies to get to Moscow that the Russians would have to travel to get to Beijing.
Yom said:How is this an advantage for either side? Both the Russians and the Chinese would have to travel great distances. Moscow isn't any closer to Beijing than Beijing is to Moscow. Furthermore, much of the land that will be traversed has separatist movements that the Chinese may be able to use to their advantage.
That's maybe due to my paranoia which pushes me to believe that Chinese people will get us all whatever happens.Gelion said:Marla I didn't expect this from you. I mean who on earth counts survivors by the number pre-war population!? Russian nukes are much more devastating than Chinese ones btw.
Of course. I mean how did Russia beat Napoleon? Winter of course. Hitler? Winter no doubt. Best Russian general. Forget Suvorov. Russo-Turkish/ Russo-Swedish wars? Winter of course. Especially in the Black sea. And of course the numbers. I mean 7000 Russians and 8000 Austrians vs. 100000 Turcs is way too much. It must've been the Austrian soldiers who contributed the most. And of course Allies loss much less in ww2 cuz they counted their men. I mean Coventry is just one great example of that.Fetus4188 said:All of Russia's wars have either been won by overwhelming numbers or the Russian winter.
Don't ever underestimate the Russian winter. Germans in the 40's also believed that in the modern day, they couldn't be caught as did Napoleon's army... and you know what happened...Fetus4188 said:All of Russia's wars have either been won by overwhelming numbers or the Russian winter. Against China, Russia has a huge disadvantage in numbers and the Russian winter would likely have little effect in the modern day.
The Ural Mountains are over-estimated, its highest peak is the evil Naroda Mountain culminating at 1,895m... Corsica is a small island of the Mediterranean which is half the size of New Jersey and it culminates at 2,500 m !!That said it is also unknown how the Ural Mountains will come into play, as no other nation has tried invasion of Russia from the east.
Well, yeah I agree with this. Even if as many people know, the winners of such wars are those who don't participate.Russia would stand no chance at invading China because if the Chinese saw their homeland being invaded they would respond with ENORMOUS numbers and drown the Russian army just as the Red Army overwhelmed Hitler. In conlusion, I would say, barring the use of nuclear weapons, China would be the victor.
lol I think so too. The future belongs to the Chinese. Lets hold on long enoughMarla_Singer said:That's maybe due to my paranoia which pushes me to believe that Chinese people will get us all whatever happens.![]()