Do you think even a public panel should have the power to order the killing of American citizens without trial? Also, does American citizenship make a difference to you? (I mean this inquisitively.)I'm not comfortable with this either. I think these procedures should be public.
Yeah, America should do this every month. Kill an American and announce that a terrorist who happened to be American was blown apart.Personally though I prefer to hear that a terrorist who happened to be American citizen was blown apart.
Who?And most conservatives apparently see no problem with it.
No and no. It would be despicable even if the panel was public, but it would at least show that the administration has a shred of respect for the citizenry.Do you think even a public panel should have the power to order the killing of American citizens without trial? Also, does American citizenship make a difference to you? (I mean this inquisitively.)
Any of those are preferable to murdering suspected criminals with drone strikes.Opposing this program, and its purported slippery slope which will eventually lead to the government being able to secretly declare a person an "unperson," is a fine idea ideologically speaking. But what other alternatives do you have in mind to bring American citizen terrorist leaders to justice? Spec-ops assault? Contact the local police? We could also ask them to turn themselves in, I guess.
I think you need to retake that political compass test. Or perhaps just drop the minus sign.Personally though I prefer to hear that a terrorist who happened to be American citizen was blown apart. It is a much better alternative than hearing that the terrorists are still at large or hearing that a couple of soldiers got gunned down while trying to arrest a terrorist.
Timothy McVeigh was the direct actor in terrorism, but he was still given a trial. Terrorist bombers Eric Rudolph and Ted Kaczynski were also similarly tried in U.S. courts.
I doubt race has anything to do with it, really. There was a trial for Zacarias Moussaoui, an al-Qaeda conspirator. There is also a trial for Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, the attempted underwear bomber, and Faisal Shahzad, the attempted Times Square bomber.What do you think the criteria for the difference is? Brown people with funny names get droned?
Timothy McVeigh was the direct actor in terrorism, but he was still given a trial. Terrorist bombers Eric Rudolph and Ted Kaczynski were also similarly tried in U.S. courts.
A long history of unconstitutional acts by the government does not forgive present or future unconstitutional acts.
Everyone deserves a trial.
Any of those are preferable to murdering suspected criminals with drone strikes.
I think you need to retake that political compass test. Or perhaps just drop the minus sign.
What do you think the criteria for the difference is? Brown people with funny names get droned?
Point to me the text in the Constitution that does away with the 5th Amendment right to due process.Who do you think knows the consitution better, you or Obama?
Who do you think knows the consitution better, you or Obama? Simply because you declare such as unconstitutional doesnt make it so.
Point to me the text in the Constitution that does away with the 5th Amendment right to due process.
Debatable.
I plead the Fifth.Who do you think knows the consitution better, you or Obama?