I do too. I would be willing to give some land up such as some land on Anatolia and give you back your city, but nothing more (to you anyway)We have some suggestions as to any partition of the Ottoman state.
BS! I'm sorry but that's too much. At that point you should own the entire damn nation. You would also have to give me considerable amount of aid for me to even think of agreeing to that.Fëanor;6459567 said:As for the Megali Idea, the USA already suggested something that should be largely along the lines of that Idea.
Then do I get the land back?Fëanor;6459642 said:As for Italy getting Anatolia, the USA will insist for it to be purely to streamline a transition from the Ottoman Empire to a Democratic Turkish state
I suggest you look at my terms. They are better than you think.Fëanor;6460247 said:Whatever will be decided the chances that the Ottoman Empire will continue to exist are practically zero, the chances that in the near future a Turkish nation is pretty hight, unless the Turks decide to be unreasonable.
I, as you may have noticed, advocated a Turkish state in control of virtually all of the Turkish majority areas, even though I could have just gone along with the frankly absurd American proposal. Give me some props already.So wait, I am going to be divided up?

Nah. Go along with the Treaty of Sevres already. That's basically all I suggested.I do too. I would be willing to give some land up such as some land on Anatolia and give you back your city, but nothing more (to you anyway)
Not all of it. Anyway, it wouldn't be you, you're not the "democratic Turkish", you're Sultan and Caliph Mahmud V.Slavic Sioux said:Then do I get the land back?

They would involve significantly different terms than OTL. Anyway, Greece will not give up Greek-majority lands to the Turk. We will go to further conflict if you insist on us yielding Thrace.I suggest you look at my terms. They are better than you think.
So I am bit confused about what your saying. Just in case if you didn't see my terms I will post them again just for reference.They would involve significantly different terms than OTL. Anyway, Greece will not give up Greek-majority lands to the Turk. We will go to further conflict if you insist on us yielding Thrace.
In your map, Thrace still belongs to you. Greece will not countenance this; we demand that we receive Thrace up to and including the Chatalja Lines. Those territories are ethnically Greek after all.So I am bit confused about what your saying. Just in case if you didn't see my terms I will post them again just for reference.
OOC: That sure isn't OOC.UK proposes a breaking up of the German Empire into smaller more easily maintained states.
Are you sure you're being Lloyd George?Did you read the terms? I was purposing that Constantinople could be an independent city state not governed by any other. I also said that I couldn't find another color that was fitting for my deal. It would still go independent though. Like Singapore, for instance.In your map, Thrace still belongs to you. Greece will not countenance this; we demand that we receive Thrace up to and including the Chatalja Lines. Those territories are ethnically Greek after all.
Thrace, just for reference, is European "Turkey", if you didn't know.
OOC: That sure isn't OOC.Are you sure you're being Lloyd George?

That I can agree to, provided that conditons go right with the other nations involved.But you're still not giving me Thrace, which was the whole point. I *did* read your proposal and found no mention of one of my key terms, ergo I was annoyed. Thrace is a lot more than just Constantinople, after all, and I wanted all of European Turkey save for the city itself to go to Greece.
EDIT: This was all I was interested in. I have made no changes to others' borders, save for the Italian sphere of influence in southwestern Anatolia. Note that Constantinople is a Free City, with its own color (brown).
![]()

Yes, the Great Powers are being disturbingly quiet. I would think that France would want to expand her old sphere of influence in Syria and Lebanon (they did intervene there in the 1840s after all IIRC) and that the Brits would raise a hullabaloo about Palestine and about not wanting the A-rabs to grab any territory. Speak up, people! We don't want this to turn into a redux of Stormy's 1919 NES, with the main focus being...not on Germany!That I can agree to, provided that conditons go right with the other nations involved.![]()

If you could add coastal Palestine and the Levant into my lands then I might agree. Heck, I might be willing to give up some of that Iraqi territory you have designated for me. Map coming up.
If you could add coastal Palestine and the Levant into my lands then I might agree. Heck, I might be willing to give up some of that Iraqi territory you have designated for me.
Well, I don't think that this will solve anything.Shut up you lost the war you lose good day.
Well, I don't think that this will solve anything.
Here it is!
![]()
By the way the African colony thing is a totaly differnt and unrelated to the Great War that's happened. PM me please about this second thing.
Why? It seems far enough to me. I am not so much worried and don't care a lot about Arabia, but I still think that they should own Mecca and Medina due to them being their holy cities.I will not agree to that.
