Mitchum
Deity
Congrats on a game well played!
I've got some reading to do...

We could have still gotten the gold too if I hadn't suggested peace with the ap vote on T165.
Regardless excellent game guys, 1st time Bronze, 2nd time Silver, 3rd time ???![]()
The Ducks had an excellent strategy as well, electing to capture the buddhist AP rather than go for a Hindu AP victory.
I now have evidence that brokering peace between 2 Civs results in a "Cease Fire" between them and not a 10-turn peace treaty.
In a test game, I bribed Isabella to make peace with Jaoa for a bunch of gold. Then 5 seconds later I bribed her to declare war on him again.
Spoiler :![]()
So I do not think we were the victim of a bug. We were just relying on a 10-turn peace treaty that did not exist to keep Shaka's only Hindu city 'GhostTown' safe from Hammarugawa. It did not flip, but was taken by force when Hamma declared on him the turn after the brokered peace treaty.
In hindsight, Shaka ceased to be Hamma's worst enemy on T164, so maybe we could have gifted one of our major cities to Shaka so he'd have more than GhostTown if Hamma declared again. It would have really hurt our vote total though.
**Edit** Bah, we still had 5 turns left on Hamma's open border treaty T164. Shaka was only willing to take DeerGold city T164, and the chariot in Hamsville would have captured it right away just like GhostTown fell. SBB would have been taken by Cyrus if we had managed to obtain it for Shaka. The only way Shaka could have had a Hindu city still by T166 is if we gifted him TWO or our major cities. That would probably have resulted in us not getting enough votes and losing the T166 win anyway.
So I do not think we were the victim of a bug. We were just relying on a 10-turn peace treaty that did not exist to keep Shaka's only Hindu city 'GhostTown' safe from Hammarugawa. It did not flip, but was taken by force when Hamma declared on him the turn after the brokered peace treaty.
You must mean a T176 win which is still silver, but ya 10 turns faster if I hadn't selected that peace vote.
I agree on the excellent game by the team. I hope you've all had you fill of SCHEMING!![]()
I now have evidence that brokering peace between 2 Civs results in a "Cease Fire" between them and not a 10-turn peace treaty.
In a test game, I bribed Isabella to make peace with Jaoa for a bunch of gold. Then 5 seconds later I bribed her to declare war on him again.
Spoiler :![]()
So I do not think we were the victim of a bug. We were just relying on a 10-turn peace treaty that did not exist to keep Shaka's only Hindu city 'GhostTown' safe from Hammarugawa. It did not flip, but was taken by force when Hamma declared on him the turn after the brokered peace treaty.
In hindsight, Shaka ceased to be Hamma's worst enemy on T164, so maybe we could have gifted one of our major cities to Shaka so he'd have more than GhostTown if Hamma declared again. It would have really hurt our vote total though.
**Edit** Bah, we still had 5 turns left on Hamma's open border treaty T164. Shaka was only willing to take DeerGold city T164, and the chariot in Hamsville would have captured it right away just like GhostTown fell. SBB would have been taken by Cyrus if we had managed to obtain it for Shaka. The only way Shaka could have had a Hindu city still by T166 is if we gifted him TWO or our major cities. That would probably have resulted in us not getting enough votes and losing the T166 win anyway.