SS-18 ICBM
Oscillator
Sweden has internationally-deployable air assets?
It doesn't matter if you're sarcastic, it's still one of the few and almost irrelevant, but maybe positive things that could be found for a Swede, moral reasons excluded.Well unless you get in there, they'll only be seeing the performance of the Rafale and the American-made fighters.
I should note, and I hate doing this, my comments along these lines are sarcastic -- the last thing America needs is more competition in arms dealing.
JAS 39 GripenSweden has internationally-deployable air assets?
You'de be amazed at the amount of NATO-standards that have been integrated. It would require an Italian landing strip though.Sweden has internationally-deployable air assets?
We're sending 6!
Norway Power!
It doesn't matter if you're sarcastic, it's still one of the few and almost irrelevant, but maybe positive things that could be found for a Swede, moral reasons excluded.
You guys don't even have your own jets. You just used your oil to buy american ones.
Kind of a sore point with the Swedish arms industry. For domestic policy reasons technically it can't sell its stuff to anyone who might actually use it in anger...Has the Gripen even seen combat? Might as well have a proven plane.
Yes. Time for neutrality to end and join NATO
Getting the contracts for Brazil and India takes more money and political power than showing you've got the best plane. ..but it might not hurt to show them off. If they do well, that is.I actually think it's very relevant. Hypothetically, you could be talking billions of euros in sales. I question if that rational would work on your voting population, but the politicians are probably keenly aware of the potential.
Has the Gripen even seen combat? Might as well have a proven plane.
"CONVINCE A COMPLETE STRANGER TO LEND YOU THEIR PHONE"
Swedish military can't even afford phones for their soldiers? No wonder that you guys prefer to stay neutral...
Anyway, if Sweden did send planes, where would they likely to be based in?
He's joking, Yared. Then again, why am I trying to stop Scandinavian bickering? It's entertaining.
Anyway, if Sweden did send planes, where would they likely to be based in?
You guys don't even have your own jets. You just used your oil to buy american ones.
Uh no? The whole poster looks something like this:
CONVINCE A COMPLETE STRANGER TO LEND YOU THEIR PHONE
As a soldier, you will need to be able to convince the locals to cooperate with you. Enlist now.
Keep in mind that the poster is urging you to go to some random person on the train and convince them to let them lend you their phone. It's not saying "As a soldier, you will need to be able to convince locals to lend you their phone."
contre said:Denmark sent 4 F16s. You don't want to be upstaged by Danes, do you?
Volum said:We're sending 6!
Norway Power!
contre said:Sweden, this is just getting embarrassing.
You're telling me they are deploying their forces where...? Hmm, maybe time has come for us to deal with our own rebels once and for allDerrick CB said:Not looking good Sweden. Your being upstaged by all the other Scandinavians. I bet Finland will send 8 F16s.
on topic...SS-18 ICBM said:Then again, why am I trying to stop Scandinavian bickering? It's entertaining.
I'm not a great fan of neighbouring states being used for UN missions, there's always a risk of conflict of interest. Russias "peace forces" in South Ossetia can be used as an example.Loppan Torkel said:UN-responsibility needs to be divided into smaller regions. UN nations closer to Libya should be forced to take a greater responsibility in that mess.
Yeah, I get it. Anyway, does it really say "Enlist now"? That kinda seems like the wrong signal to send. Shouldn't they be encouraging people to consider the situation well and make an informed choice before they decide if they want to join the military? "Enlist now" sounds like something on a poster from 1914.
Well, there has to be some sense in selecting the nations. "The Big Satan" and the other smaller satans don't have to intervene again and again where there's an obvious clash of cultures.I'm not a great fan of neighbouring states being used for UN missions, there's always a risk of conflict of interest. Russias "peace forces" in South Ossetia can be used as an example.