Hygro
soundcloud.com/hygro/
don't accuse me of bias/ confirming my world view thanks.......
Present the alternate argument.
Tell you what, you worry about what argument you're presenting and I'll worry about mine.
don't accuse me of bias/ confirming my world view thanks.......
Present the alternate argument.
Tell you what, you worry about what argument you're presenting and I'll worry about mine.
I'm honestly quite worried about the schizophrenia and depression data when it comes to teens smoking marijuana. I'm not of the opinion that a broad criminalization helps this.
..........No
don't accuse me of bias present an argument please you have not done so beyond fling accusations.
..........No
don't accuse me of bias present an argument please you have not done so beyond fling accusations.
I think there's vastly more societal destruction caused by its criminalization, since we're talking jailings, court-time, etc. The number of people protected is very low, since it's so easy to get MJ anyway.
We'd save tons of money legalizing it, and then investing in cures for depression and schizophrenia, instead of the trickle of funding it gets right now.
Perhaps especially when if its grown commercially it is subject to standards and those standards would reduce risks, thus costing society less.
However if cannabis causes or significantly adds to schizophrenia then we have just allowed evil.
Bombs kill people, so we allow evil every time we pay taxes. Drawing the line at cannabis seems a bit superfluous, doesn't it?
Well I kinda can't do anything about War Tim that's what elections are for....
And if you don't pay taxes....well
You can stop your neighbour making the lobby stink/ messin it up damaging the lobby door and inviting his drug dealer friend.
The jump reversion from the evil of contributing to depression and schizophrenia back to the smell in the lobby does not go unremarked.![]()
Thus Objectivism holds that drug abuse is an immoral abdication of reason and profoundly self-destructive. But there is nothing about it that demands the initiation of force against others. Drugs are traded by violent criminals today because the drug trade is illegal, not because it inherently attracts criminals. The mob sold booze during Prohibition, after all, but it does not do so now that alcohol is legal again. We would be much better off to end the drug war and have the peace of free trade instead.
Perhaps especially when if its grown commercially it is subject to standards and those standards would reduce risks, thus costing society less.
However if cannabis causes or significantly adds to schizophrenia then we have just allowed evil.
How in any way can you equate the two? They are in no way similar.Everytime someone says we should decriminalize Cannabis, so that we control it better and get some money from its taxes, my reaction is that we can decriminalize infant murder for the same reasons [emoji14].
(this is probably a fallacy, but the given argument itself is probably one too)
Also: I live in the Netherlands, therefore [x] lemons.
This question was brought to the fore for me for two reasons
There was a vehicle crime in my area, and secondly my neighbor downstairs uses Cannabis and stinks up the lobby, not only that but I know who deals it or rather I know the vehicle used ( I have the license plate number)
Moral question with several off shoots:
1 Is cannabis destructive to society?
2 Does it cause things like vehicle crime?
3 Will there be blowout from this?
I don't like snitching on people so I haven't yet.
Your thoughts?