We more or less knew it. It was stated in one of early info dumps, what Firaxis focuses on smooth run on all platforms first and add larger maps later.
We more or less knew it. It was stated in one of early info dumps, what Firaxis focuses on smooth run on all platforms first and add larger maps later.
Oh, a Japanese leader having personas don't surprise me. The thing is that Himiko is a old and hard to get reliable information on figure, so it is surprising they would give her a second version.
Oh, a Japanese leader having personas don't surprise me. The thing is that Himiko is a old and hard to get reliable information on figure, so it is surprising they would give her a second version.
Well, I'll rather choose Yamatai Himiko and Tenno Himiko for her personas. Not because of mass media like anime, just for her historical part and symbolic part.
As a historical queen of Yamatai, she was not an actual ancestor of Japanese Emperors. She was just a leader of the strongest faction within the ancient Japan. Under her reign, Yamatai ruled the small states and became the first Japanese faction which introduced itself to the regional diplomacy of East Asia. But it slowly replaced with the successors, so Himiko's legacy was transferred to the another families: finally the Emperors of Japan.
On the other hand, after the concept of "eternal blood line of Emperors" established, the historians need to prove that the every rulers of ancient Japan had blood ties with nowadays Emperor. Himiko didn't, so they decided to remove her story. Her reign and legacy partially handed over to fictional Emperors - especially Empress Jingu, who become a symbolic icon of the Japanese expansion. But ironically, this decision unintentionally caused the result that Himiko become very famous in modern Japan. She never was an Empress(Tenno) nor a family of the Emperors, but later people made her the Empress and the ancestor of them. Tenno Himiko may be a good expression of Japanese Emperors, dodging the controversial modern Emperors.
RangerArea had a game in which two leaders chose appropriate civs: Ashoka-Maurya, Amina-Aksum. The others were Tubman of Egypt and Rizal of the Maya. He was playing as Rome.
Another detail from later in the same boesthius video - momentos can be changed at each age transition, before entering the next age and picking your legacies.
I guess I didn't realize previously that unless a city center is founded directly on the coast or a navigable river, then it is unable to construct water units as you can no longer create a "harbor district" offset from the city center like you could in VI.
Another detail from later in the same boesthius video - momentos can be changed at each age transition, before entering the next age and picking your legacies.
Man in the Boes video the age ended at like 1000 BCE. Feels kind of weird that there’s a 1400 year gap. Until Exploration. Maybe there’s something to the notion of a more Medieval focused DLC. I have my doubts, but man. Everything else looks great but the thousand year gap is a hard pill to swallow.
Man in the Boes video the age ended at like 1000 BCE. Feels kind of weird that there’s a 1400 year gap. Until Exploration. Maybe there’s something to the notion of a more Medieval focused DLC. I have my doubts, but man. Everything else looks great but the thousand year gap is a hard pill to swallow.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.