Mango Elephant
Deity
What do you three think of Camikaze?
I voted for CH because I felt like it, I didn't think anything would come of it.
What do you three think of Camikaze?
I had forgotten the tally and hadn't looked at it before I had posted that. Call it a case of mistaken identity not dodging the question
No I have no reason to think that camikaze is scum. From what it looks like he voted to save himself which is and isn't scummy but its not as scummy as CH.
I answered the god damn question if people would just look up every once in a while. I was honestly just self misinformed and did not check the tally. I had thought that Camikaze had voted for red spy. I don't really think that Camikaze is guilty at this point. That answers the question that Zack asked.Vote: dcmort He does seem to be avoiding the Camikaze question.
If you are saying you think classical_hero is scum, then logically it would follow that you believe Camikaze to be scum.
Do you believe both classical_hero and Camikaze to be scum?
Also by your thoughts on the people voting for CH, then Robbie, Gamezrule, and NedimNapoleon are scum as well.
When did I say that I think Camikaze is suspicious? I'm just urging those of you to be consistent and logical in your approach to scum-hunting. If you're voting classical_hero for his lynch vote last round, then it would follow that you believe something is up about Camikaze, as classical_hero's vote saved Camikaze.The ONLY reason you are getting on Camikaze's case is because he voted for you making you essentially OMGUSing
You look scummy because you are doing the same thing Classical did yesterday, only making a counter wagon instead of changing your vote at the last minute.I look scummy because I presented an alternate case
You look scummy because you are doing the same thing Classical did yesterday, only making a counter wagon instead of changing your vote at the last minute.
It's not a valid case then or now. (Linkage?)I've been pinned on the same thing that CH is being pinned on, the question is why was it a valid case then but not now?