British ships visited the future Vladivostok bay in 1856. The Brits named the bay "Port May". Dunno if they had any colonization plans there, but they possibly would have made such plans, at least.
Vladivostok is not exactly Siberia, though.
At the time it wasn't even Russian territory, but Manchu.
1609?how could japan do it? By the time japan was even willing to acknowledge the outside world, russia was already there.
Take it over from the Russians after they got it? After the Amur River imbroglio with the Qing, I can't think of anything until the Russian Civil War when the Japanese occupied part of Siberia. I'm sure the British were at least interested in it much earlier, and there might be something in the late 18th century (since the British were getting into shouting matches over Nootka Sound and the Vancouver area with the Spanish and Russians in the 1780s IIRC, so they certainly were interested in the north Pacific, and Pitt the Younger loved grandiose partition plans). Don't recall any specifics, though.Dachs, you may know did anyone else ever seriously consider trying to take over all or part of Siberia? Seems like something the Brits would have at least considered...
True. Of course, the peoples of these lands, brutally oppressed by Beijing, gladly joined the brotherhood of Russian people![]()
That's what a Soviet publication from 1951 told me. It depicted a mean stupid Imperial Chinese official ousted by a brave smart Russian explorer, to the joy of all native peoples. To be fair, the Russian Czar was also portrayed as mean and stupid.The Manchu-origin Qing Dynasty are oppressing the people in the lands of the Manchus?
Umm what? The coldest town in Earth may be in Siberia, but that does not mean the whole region is polar desert encased in permafrost. What exactly makes temperate broadleaf forests "most inhospitable territory in the world"?the largest (and most inhospitable) territory in the world
Soviet Russia had such a schizophrenic attitude towards its own past.That's what a Soviet publication from 1951 told me. It depicted a mean stupid Imperial Chinese official ousted by a brave smart Russian explorer, to the joy of all native peoples. To be fair, the Russian Czar was also portrayed as mean and stupid.
What might have happened the territory if Russia hadn't colonised it? Let's say because of war, famine, or political reasons Russia decides to expand west or even not expand at all, what might be Siberia's status now?
Umm what? The coldest town in Earth may be in Siberia, but that does not mean the whole region is polar desert encased in permafrost. What exactly makes temperate broadleaf forests "most inhospitable territory in the world"?
Russia is a country with an unpredictable past.Soviet Russia had such a schizophrenic attitude towards its own past.
Yeah well, Japan is behind the sea. Also note that the meaning of "develop" has noticeably changed over the years - back then it primarily meant "build a log fort and garrison it to bully out tribute from nearby stone-age hunter-gatherers".Hyperbole, but it's up there. Supplying and maintaining the place from Japan would be an absolute nightmare, even now the Russians can't develop much of the place mainly due to its geography and climate.
The best humor is always true!Russia is a country with an unpredictable past.
-Russian saying.
So was Britain.Yeah well, Japan is behind the sea.
Which is why neither of them succeeded?So was Britain.![]()