Well, hoping for Italy to make into BNW is a gamble. Maybe it'll pay off, maybe not. I don't pin all my hopes on it, as I'm overall pretty happy with everything included so far (I'd long ago given up hope on Assyria), and there are other civ's on my wish list as well. If I see an Italian city-state in a screenshot at this point, I'll flinch a little but I won't be crestfallen.Continuerò sperando! I'm really hopeful, since we've gone so long without seeing either Venice, Genoa, Florence, Milan (are there any more
It's probably not my place to ask (and I suppose this is the correct place for you to post it), but could we please keep Italy bashing out of this thread at this point? We've gone through all the tired and repeated arguments by this point. All anyone can do is repeat the same stuff over and over. Overlap with Rome, Covered by City-States, etc.
What do I feel a lot more confident about is that if we continue to promote italy, we can win more folks over (indeed, I've seen multiple "I've come around" posts) and we can get Italy added in somewhere.
Now, there are folks against the idea of Italy's inclusion, and that's fine. If they have a compelling argument to contribute to the discussion, that's great. It's another chance to present our case. If they don't, they undermine themselves. So Snoop drives by and hastily tosses in his negative contribution. The we get the "Rome overlap" bit that's been the object of refutation so many times. I don't see these kind of posts winning hearts and minds in the face of articulate and passionate resolve. There's a limited audience for negativity.
Great work on the leaderhead, btw!