Stairway to Heaven

I'm going to vote: JoanK as I think he's been vocal enough but playing completely safe. His votes have been on middle-of-the-road candidates. And I don't like "feelings".
 
How many meanings has the word "apparent"? Because I know only one that would be absurd to use in this situation... :confused:

TheFreeDictionary.com said:
ap·par·ent (-prnt, -pâr-)
adj.
1. Readily seen; visible.
2. Readily understood; clear or obvious.
3. Appearing as such but not necessarily so; seeming: an apparent advantage.

You'e welcome. ;)
 
Thank you very much, I was aware of the 3rd meaning only. :p
 
Vote: Mechaerik The sotto voce comment there serves no other purpose than to try to softly say "I'm not scum, see, here's a reason for this vote". Which it doesn't actually show at all.

The purpose it has is that Ninjacow said he hated voteposts that were just a vote and had no other content.
 
Gentlemen, while this current discussion may be interesting, I believe that lurkers are our greatest threat here, because at least we can analyze posts later on for scum tells.

Vote: SamSniped, have any words for us?

I'm not a lurker? I haven't posted much because of school and RL,which take up a lot of time. Thankfully school ends for me on the 19th, so I will have more spare time.
My vote was because of CivCube's logic (and that logic was that posting right after the vote equals being suspicious or something similar). I think that CivCube either seems to want to get rid of JoanK for some reason other than what was next to his post, was being lazy, or really does think that way (in which case I want him to know that it's possible to be online when an update is posted).
 
That was an even lazier vote than SouthernKing's.

Unvote, Vote: Autolycus
 
I'm going to vote: JoanK as I think he's been vocal enough but playing completely safe. His votes have been on middle-of-the-road candidates. And I don't like "feelings".

Exactly why I'm going after him this round. I get the feeling he's hiding in the spam; while someone can certainly be around after an update*, I'm sensing that he's too eager to keep the spamentum going. Definitely scummy.

*Me, for example. I posted right after JoanK.
 
This is a lazy vote if I have ever seen one. It sounds just good enough to get past the “no reason” reaction you might get for it, but totally relies on the meta-game.

There are valid reasons to be voting for Double A – like the fact that he has been in the bandwagon that lynched innocent townies both days or that he his posting marginally spammy posts, but isn’t voting – but citing something like this is just lazy.

SouthernKing

Don't I normally do that in big games? Probably why I do better in TWC games.

Anyway, I don't see any better case, so vote: SK. I'm also tired of that meme.

That wasn't a lynch writeup. :p

... do night writeups give clues?
 
And if you lynch me, you'll get this message:

Spoiler :
...Vanilla Townie
…it's in Green when you're a vanilla townie.
Gah, you and your experimental rules, Zack. :mad:

I keep thinking I'm in the wrong thread when a dead person votes.
It isn't experimental, there's been other votes like that before.
What's wrong with Texas?
mellow.gif
Well, for sa start, it's Texas. Ask Zack for more details.
Or so he says...
If you're looking for trickster GMs, here I am. But Zack isn't one. (Right, Zacccino?)
 
Back
Top Bottom