Status and "To Do" List
- Thread starter Wyz_sub10
- Start date
Found the link:
<link removed>
Edit: Didn't realise it was at CivFanatics - http://forums.civfanatics.com/downloads.php?do=file&id=3271
<link removed>
Edit: Didn't realise it was at CivFanatics - http://forums.civfanatics.com/downloads.php?do=file&id=3271
Joebasalt13
Warlord
Thanks 9 minutes wait till I download!
Satyr216 said:
Please use the Civfanatics link:
http://forums.civfanatics.com/downloads.php?do=file&id=3271
Head Serf
Emperor
I'm downloading now. 
purplexus
Prince
WOO HOOOOO! and as they say In Calgary..... YEEEE HAW!
cthom
3,011,451,295
i'm afraid i still don't have warlords yet. btw is Scotland still in or removed because Celts in? if in, what's the UB?
cthom said:
Scotland, Ireland and the Celts were all in vanilla 3.0, so they all remain in the Warlords edition.
Firaxis' Celts have the Dun (wall) as their UB. Scotland uses the Mercat Cross (market) and the Irish use the Publishing House (library).
Head Serf
Emperor
I noticed a small bug. When I first met the Swedes in-game, the Diplomacy text was just a text tag, as in TXT_SWEDEN_FIRST_CONTACT_TEXT or something similar.
Shqype
Shqyptar
I've noticed 2 mistakes with the Albanians:
1) Their UB should be called Llogor (with 2 L's), not "Illogor."
2) Their UB should replace the factory (NOT the barracks) and give +2 experience to gunpowder units, or maybe even +3 since only gunpowder units would get that advantage considerably late in the game.
Aside from that, the building representing the llogor doesn't look bad.
1) Their UB should be called Llogor (with 2 L's), not "Illogor."
2) Their UB should replace the factory (NOT the barracks) and give +2 experience to gunpowder units, or maybe even +3 since only gunpowder units would get that advantage considerably late in the game.
Aside from that, the building representing the llogor doesn't look bad.
Shqype said:
Ugh. You know, I had Llogor originally, then thought I had made a mistake and changed them all the wrong way.
If it replaces the factory, then +3 is probably appropriate. Did you notice the DDS icon? That's an actual church in Albanian Azerbaijan that played some role in the war with the Turks.
Shqype
Shqyptar
What does Albania have to do with Azerbaijan?
Shqype said:
I was reading that North Azerbailjan in the 5th century was heavily populated with ethnic Albanians, with the region being known as Caucasian Albania. It was an interesting story and I was taken with the pic, because it kinda sounded like what you described.
But if you have a more appropriate pic, let me know.
Shqype
Shqyptar
Albania and Caucasian "Albania" (Aghbania) are two completely different things that have no relation to each other, with the exception of a name, the latter of which is (I believe) latinized. Ethnically, racially and linguistically, they are 2 separate peoples.
Montenegrins, Serbs, and others against the Albanians tend to perpetrate the argument that Albanians and Aghbanians are related to discredit the Illyro-Albanian continuity and try to eliminate the Albanian claim to Albanian-inhabited lands in the Balkans, especially Kosova.
The Albanians speak an Indo-European language, the descendant of the ancient Illyrian language, while the Aghbanians speak a Caucasian language. The only similarity is the name: but keep in mind during the middle ages Scotland was also called Albania ...
I'll see if I can find a more appropriate picture.
Montenegrins, Serbs, and others against the Albanians tend to perpetrate the argument that Albanians and Aghbanians are related to discredit the Illyro-Albanian continuity and try to eliminate the Albanian claim to Albanian-inhabited lands in the Balkans, especially Kosova.
The Albanians speak an Indo-European language, the descendant of the ancient Illyrian language, while the Aghbanians speak a Caucasian language. The only similarity is the name: but keep in mind during the middle ages Scotland was also called Albania ...
I'll see if I can find a more appropriate picture.
