jlvfr
King
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2007
- Messages
- 982
I'm well into the last era & still no ability to make military alliances. Don't know why.
Same here.
I'm well into the last era & still no ability to make military alliances. Don't know why.
Possible bug:
I built the "Call of Cthulhu" in Paris, but didn't get any advances...
I just tested it and it's workingI suspected that as well. Had a commando in a city with an aerodrome. No button. It's been a few days, so it's possible it was with an older biq.
I'll beef up Mal. a bit.Playing as the Mal., China started a war. They overwhelm with waves of units that contain only a few advanced units. Can't produce or move superior units fast enough to keep them from devastating territory & taking cities. Finally beat them back but not being able to build railroads really cripples a small technological advanced civ when attacked by a much larger opponent. And when they break the peace treaty after only two turns the lack of alliances plus the crippled industrial base really hurts. An army unit (advanced mech suit?) would help as well.
It gives you a Mind Flayer 32.60.2 every 5 turns. It doesn't grant any advances.
Ok, then I'm missing something. Maybe I didn't have the commando in the city with the aerodrome.I just tested it and it's working![]()
Ah, then ya gotta change the description![]()
Another problem I spoted: the Mesoamericans (and maybe the Africans, didn't check yet) have severe expansion problems, due to the inability to clear jungle. The workers should get this ability with some tech; I'd sugest Steam Engine.
Thanks for the recap. I've fixed those issues now - here are some details.
I will be splitting the naval lines between power and transport.
I've got a Flak unit in for air cover.
Clear Jungles (Wetland) now comes with Heroic Engineering.
Immobile Death Rays were intentional but to compensate they have a range of 2 and can be paradropped.
Still working on the civilopedia.![]()
I've got a Flak unit in for air cover.
How about a steam powered ballista to shoot down steam powered airships?
If such a thing were created, I would certainly use it. What we do have is called a "cloudbuster". There is no unit created for it yet (right now it's a "building" with defense against attack), but if you could imagine a steam-powered orchestra bassoon section you'd be not far away from it. If you thought Tower of Power had a "killer" horn section you ain't seen nothing....
Discussed a couple of different places in our project subforum. Image from "Cloudbusting" video by Kate Bush. Japanese War Tuba that was the image used to make the "Cloudbusting Tech" Icon (in lower right corner).
Just for grins, I think I'll put this on the "list", Balthasar.![]()
As a side note, your entry on Cloudbusting in the notes say that the picture is a real prototype of a dirigible buster, but I though I remembered it as being something else....so I wikipedia-ed it! Turns out, I saw that pic in a WWII encyclopedia of mine. Check it out here. It's actually a primitive sonar/radar contraption. Still quite SP if you ask me, though.
This might help pinktilapia, who on post #7 of the SP Scenario thread wanted to know how tubas can take down blimps...
Not trying to nitpick...still makes sense as a Cloudbuster....just trying to help!
quotes were edited (abbreviated) to remove duplicated quotations & material on other topics.Thanks, Deth McBones. You're right about the image source; my description was misleading. I posted the end of the train of thought rather than the beginning: a detection system is part of an AA weapons system -> dirigibles & zeppelins feature prominently in most SP aerial warfare portrayals I've seen -> "cloudbusting" just seemed to fit the visual look. On the gripping hand, there's all the current discussion & prototyping of non-lethal weapons systems including sonics. An SP equivalent with this sort of look, especially given Tesla's research involving the destructive powers of harmonic vibration, is easy to imagine.
Did you read the entire post? And follow the links? That's a picture of a sound detector. It is suggestive rather than proscriptive. Steamunk is meant to be more imaginative than a simple substitution of the energy source of a quotidian device. The steampunk weapon described in the rest of the post has a superficial resemblance to the photo but a quite different mechanism. If you've ever been the target of air under sufficient pressure you'd understand this type of weapon. I've experienced it - as a burst, not a constant stream. It was both painful and deafening. And that was just a child's toy. Ask any pyrotechnician - I've worked as one - about the sonic effect of being next to a mortar firing a report that has a low burst. Steam - used as a motive force - most people would call energy. An array of the multi-barrelled energy weapons described in the rest of the post would be much more like the weapon designed by Palmcrantz (deployed by the Royal Navy) than that of Mr. Gatling.Those are sound detectors. Every nation messed with those, before radar.
Still prefer an energy gun, or steam-powered gatling![]()
Did you read the entire post? And follow the links? That's a picture of a sound detector. It is suggestive rather than proscriptive. Steamunk is meant to be more imaginative than a simple substitution of the energy source of a quotidian device. The steampunk weapon described in the rest of the post has a superficial resemblance to the photo but a quite different mechanism. If you've ever been the target of air under sufficient pressure you'd understand this type of weapon. I've experienced it - as a burst, not a constant stream. It was both painful and deafening. And that was just a child's toy. Ask any pyrotechnician - I've worked as one - about the sonic effect of being next to a mortar firing a report that has a low burst. Steam - used as a motive force - most people would call energy. An array of the multi-barrelled energy weapons described in the rest of the post would be much more like the weapon designed by Palmcrantz (deployed by the Royal Navy) than that of Mr. Gatling.