Yep - raising taxes pays for the ponies.
They aren't constitutional. I just think the battle on them was lost. How in the hell can you restructure $1.6 trillion/yr going from people who hardly notice that they are paying payroll taxes to people who come to rely on those checks every month?
Ironically, the much more radical single payer would pass muster just fine. It was a bad compromise and a Frankenstein's monster of a law. Hopefully they will strike down the entire law so we can push for real socialized medicine.
I'm actually thinking I should have voted "hope so," because the law is ultimately somewhat flawed at the core.
Poor solution > no solution is shortsighted, bad solutions can in fact make situations worse. The option isnt simply better or what we have now.
I agree with this to a point... there should be an emergency switch to assume debt WHEN it is avoid catastrophe... but in general, I would like to see spending equal revenue.The issue of tax rates is a red herring.
Tax rates do not matter. There is no dirrect relationship between tax revenue and spending. If we raise taxes and revenue by 50%, Congress will respond by raising spending by more than 50%. This is the issue. We still go bankrupt. Therefore raising rates does nothing.
We will have to have an amendment to the Constitution to force Congress to make tough, responsible choices. There is no other way to avoid financial catastrophe.
But even the American dream is deficit spending. Many of us go in to debt for a house. Surely, that is not an emergency.I agree with this to a point... there should be an emergency switch to assume debt WHEN it is avoid catastrophe... but in general, I would like to see spending equal revenue.
But, in the end, each of us are held accountable by a higher source... the bank and law.But even the American dream is deficit spending. Many of us go in to debt for a house. Surely, that is not an emergency.
The bondholders and future bondholders.Who is holding the gubbamint accountable?
Hahhahahaa, if you say so.The bondholders and future bondholders.
Yep - they sell the bonds in the marketplace - if the marketplace determines the risk is too high, the selling process won't go so well.Hahhahahaa, if you say so.
Yep, no shenanigans involved in that, right?Yep - they sell the bonds in the marketplace - if the marketplace determines the risk is too high, the selling process won't go so well.
It is Wall Street, so it's on the up and up from what conservatives tell me. I mean, they are calling for Social Security to be run by Wall Street.Yep, no shenanigans involved in that, right?
Well, let's just put our entire hopes in the stock market! A stock market bubble is just what we need!It is Wall Street, so it's on the up and up from what conservatives tell me. I mean, they are calling for Social Security to be run by Wall Street.
Bonds are usually a good place to be when the bubble bursts. You do realize that your home mortgage, student loan, and much of your consumer debt get traded on Wall Street, right?Well, let's just put our entire hopes in the stock market! A stock market bubble is just what we need!
So is gold, from what I hear...Bonds are usually a good place to be when the bubble bursts.