Take Two (maker of GTA) rejects EA's 2 Billion Dollar Bid

downtown

Crafternoon Delight
Joined
Jun 11, 2004
Messages
19,541
Location
Chicago
EA is trying to totally monopolize the Sports Video Game industry! :aargh: :run: :run:

NEW YORK (AP) -- The company behind the hugely popular video game "Grand Theft Auto" says it is not going to jump at a $2 billion buyout offer from Electronic Arts Inc.


Video games from Take-Two and Electronic Arts share shelf space at a Best Buy store.

The offer is "the wrong price at the wrong time," Take-Two Interactive Software Inc. chief executive Ben Feder said Monday, after the news of the $26-per-share bid sent Take-Two's shares up 55 percent to a $26.89 close.

Electronic Arts is undervaluing Take-Two and not factoring in the benefits of its recent turnaround efforts, Feder said in an interview. Take-Two said it is open to discussions with EA, but wants to wait until April 30, the day after the latest version of Grand Theft Auto hits store shelves.

But analysts said Take-Two may not have the luxury of time. While Take-Two wants a higher price, EA could make this bid hostile, or walk away and come back with a lower offer, they said.

"There can be no certainty that in the future EA or any other buyer would pay the premium we are proposing today," EA's CEO John Riccitiello said during a conference call.

"We believe our proposal is fully priced," he said. Since "Grand Theft Auto IV" should by now be essentially complete, he added, the buyout bid "would not jeopardize the development of this incredibly important title."

GTA has sold more than 65 million copies in the decade since the first game in the series, where players complete gritty crime missions to rise to the top.
Don't Miss

* Fortune: Zap! Videogame takeover fight heats up
* Gamers star in "Rock Band"
* Star pitcher trading fastballs for video games
* Sony, Skype calling gamers

Take-Two called the timing of EA's unsolicited offer "opportunistic" because it is so close to the launch date of the new version of GTA. Redwood City, California-based EA says it wants to act now so that it can get its marketing muscle behind GTA before the holiday season, when video game companies make most of their money.

EA's offer represents a 64 percent premium over Take-Two's closing stock price of $15.83 on February 15, the last trading day before the company made its latest proposal, privately, to Take-Two. EA, which said it has been in talks with Take-Two on and off for about a year, offered $26 per share on February 19, after Take-Two rejected a $25-per-share bid four days earlier. EA went public with the higher bid on Sunday.

Citi Investment Research analyst Brent Thill said EA "may be willing to pay slightly, but not materially, higher than its current offer."

While much of Wall Street's and gamers' focus Monday was on Grand Theft Auto, Michael Pachter, an analyst with Wedbush Morgan Securities, said it's Take-Two's sports business that would be the most lucrative for EA.

"The whole world seems to think this is GTA and nothing else," he said, adding that the franchise "is the best asset for everybody except EA."

"For EA, the best asset is sports," he said. "And that's why there won't be a higher offer [from another company]. No one else will value sports higher."

EA, which owns the Madden NFL and FIFA Soccer franchises, would round out its holdings with Take-Two's baseball, basketball and hockey titles to dominate the sports game arena.

Even if EA wins Take-Two, it isn't clear whether the brothers who helped create "Grand Theft Auto" will stay on. Sam and Dan Houser, who lead Take-Two's Rockstar Games label, are under contract with the company only until next year. Sam Houser could not be reached for comment Monday and Take-Two would not comment on what it said was a confidential matter.

Thill said, however, he thinks there is "considerable value" for a development studio to tap into EA's financial, marketing and distribution resources.

Josh Resnick, the co-founder and general manager of Pandemic Studios, which EA recently acquired along with BioWare Corp. for $860 million, agreed. He said Riccitiello quickly allayed concerns about the studio being able to maintain creative control and independence.

"John is one of those rare executives in the games industry who really gets it," he said.

Since taking EA's helm a year ago, Riccitiello has reorganized the company into a "city-state model," with four divisions and distinct, independent studios. His vision, Resnick said, has allowed studios like Pandemic to "have the freedom and flexibility to do what they need to do to make great products."

Feder and ZelnickMedia Chairman Strauss Zelnick took Take-Two's helm last year after a March shareholder coup ousted most of the company's top executives and board members over poor results, accounting troubles and controversy surrounding violent and sexual content in the company's games.

Several former Take-Two executives, including Chairman and CEO Ryan A. Brant, pleaded guilty in 2007 to falsifying business records in connection with a probe into backdated stock options.

What do you guys think about this? If EA pulled this off, they would be, by far, the most powerful video game company, and would control almost every single sports video game created. Can Take Two hold them off forever? Was this a smart move?
 
Its just the free market at work! The TT guys get a buttload of money, and EA gets the series! If TT accepts the offer, then it is by definition good, because everybody follows their rational self-interest. Plus, this is probably better for society at large. The butcher and the baker do better for eachother by combining forces. I look forward to the day when every single product for everything is controlled by one corporation.
 
They're not even the most powerful now. Activision recently merged with another ocmpany putting them on top. I however am thrilled. I was a big fan of MVP baseball and am sickened by my forced playing of 2K baseball. They odn't even have farm teams.
 
YES thank god!!!

Imagine Civ with EA!

new crappy versions every year, new crappier then Warlords expansions every 2 months, horrible gameplay etc.
 
I don't care I only play civ3 lts see them . .. .. .. . that one up.
 
They're not even the most powerful now. Activision recently merged with another ocmpany putting them on top. I however am thrilled. I was a big fan of MVP baseball and am sickened by my forced playing of 2K baseball. They odn't even have farm teams.

But you aren't forced to only play 1 baseball game, since the MLB granted multiple licenses.

The NFL and NCAAF granted licences ONLY to EA, so basically, no other company can make football games. Now, the engine and gameplay are awesome, but since gamers don't really have a choice, EA doesn't add a whole lot year to year, other than roster and rating updates (and still charge almost 60 bucks).

The games where we have competition (NBA, college Basketball, MLB, NHL) have much better video games...'specially with basketball, since LIVE and March Madness haven't been good for almost 5 years. I don't a sports game monopoly.
 
YES thank god!!!

Imagine Civ with EA!

new crappy versions every year, new crappier then Warlords expansions every 2 months, horrible gameplay etc.

Producing crappie versions of a videogame is a typical strategy of EA to make gamers buy the expansion and to destroy the rivals selling game of high quality before them ;)
 
Good thing, I wouldn't want to see Take Two EAised.
 
But you aren't forced to only play 1 baseball game, since the MLB granted multiple licenses.

The NFL and NCAAF granted licences ONLY to EA, so basically, no other company can make football games. Now, the engine and gameplay are awesome, but since gamers don't really have a choice, EA doesn't add a whole lot year to year, other than roster and rating updates (and still charge almost 60 bucks).

The games where we have competition (NBA, college Basketball, MLB, NHL) have much better video games...'specially with basketball, since LIVE and March Madness haven't been good for almost 5 years. I don't a sports game monopoly.

MLB sold exclusive third party licenses to Take 2. Sony, microsoft, or nintendo can make they're own games.
 
MLB sold exclusive third party licenses to Take 2. Sony, microsoft, or nintendo can make they're own games.

If the MLB only gave one set of licences, how can other companies make video games that use MLB teams and logos?
 
Because they only sold third party rights. (Companies who don't make consoles.) So sony, nintendo, and microsoft can still make games for they're respectie consoles. The BIGS was also amde by take two.
 
So the shadow of Electronic Assimilation falls over our beloved Civ...

theo_unicron1.jpg
 
Funny this happens a few days after the EA CEO says their old way of doing business wasn't working. (i.e. taking over every smaller developer they can get their dirty hands on.)

Nothing is more annoying than that stupid "challenge everything" line before all those EA games... god I hated that.
 
Nothing is more annoying than that stupid "challenge everything" line before all those EA games... god I hated that.

They still have that? Last time I bought one of their games was years ago and I hated that thing so much I would turn off the speakers before starting the game.
 
EA needs to be prevented from doing anything other than sports games. That's all I have to say. And prevented from buying decent game makers (cough cough Westwood and Maxis).
 
Back
Top Bottom