The 12 commandments of MS Windows...

Che Guava

The Juicy Revolutionary
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
5,955
Location
Hali-town,
Apparently Gates' & Co have come up with 12 tenents of a new philosophy for Windows. Here are the highlights:



Microsoft Establishes 12 Principles for Windows Development


WASHINGTON—Microsoft has announced 12 principles by which the company will guide its development of the Windows desktop platform, starting with Windows Vista and beyond.

At a New America Foundation Policy Luncheon at the National Press Club here, Brad Smith, Microsoft's senior vice president and general counsel, outlined the principles and discussed lessons Microsoft has learned over the past 10 years based on antitrust battles, regulatory scrutiny and fierce competition in the operating system and software market in general.

Smith said the principles largely come from things Microsoft picked up in the consent decree the software giant signed in settling its landmark antitrust battle with the federal government, but that more recent developments led to the crafting of some of the other principles.



The first principle goes to the installation of any software.


"We will ensure that Microsoft will design Windows in ways that make it easy for people to add non-Microsoft features," Smith said.


No. 2 is easy access: Computer manufacturers are free to add icons, shortcuts and the like to the Windows Start menu and other places used to access software programs so that customers can easily find them, Microsoft said.

No. 3 is defaults. Microsoft will design Windows so as to let computer manufacturers and users set non-Microsoft programs to operate by default in certain categories, such as Web browsing and media playback, Microsoft said; computer manufacturers can set these defaults as they please when building new PCs.

No. 4 is exclusive promotion of non-Microsoft programs, Smith said.

"This is an important new issue in regard to things like media and Internet search, as we are broadening to adopt this for Internet search as well," he said, indicating that Microsoft's fierce competition with Google aside, the company is dedicated to this principle.

No. 5 is business terms:
Microsoft will not retaliate against any computer manufacturer that supports non-Microsoft software, Smith said.

To provide transparency on this point, Microsoft will post a standard volume-based price list to a Web site that is accessible to computer manufacturers, as it has under the U.S. antitrust ruling, he said.

Principle No. 6 deals with APIs. Microsoft provides the developer community with a broad range of innovative operating system services, via documented APIs (application programming interfaces), for use in developing state-of-the-art applications.

And the U.S. antitrust ruling requires that Microsoft disclose all of the interfaces internal to Windows called by "middleware" within the operating system, Smith said.

Principle No. 7 involves Internet services
, where Microsoft is contributing to innovation in the area of Internet services with services that the company calls Windows Live, Smith said.

"Microsoft will design Windows Live as a product that is separate from Windows. Customers will be free to choose Windows with or without Windows Live," the company said.

No. 8 is Open Internet access, where Microsoft will design and license Windows so that it does not block access to any lawful Web site or impose any fee for reaching any non-Microsoft Web site or using any non-Microsoft Web service, Smith said.

Principle No. 9 is "no exclusivity," Smith said.

The U.S. antitrust ruling provides that Microsoft may not enter into contracts that require any third party to promote Windows or any "middleware" in Windows on an exclusive basis and Microsoft has pledged to continue this, Smith said.

Principles 10 through 12 deal with interoperability for users and say that Microsoft will make its communications protocols available for commercial release, the company will generally license patents on its operating system inventions, and the company is committed to supporting industry standards.

LINK!

Just interested in what more computer savvy folk think of MS's new philosophy. Will it send them into bold new digital territory, or is this just the least they could do to keep the anti-trust lawyers away?
 
the principles sound good by themselves. The question remains if this is just a PR-Stunt or if they actually live by them....

considering MS' past, I'm not too optimistic, especially regarding the last sentance, MS isn't known to really support industry standards, they usually embrace them and modify them to their needs, so that in the end they aren't standards anymore (like they did with numerous HTML-tags, for example)
 
Of course it's f--king PR stunt. The important 'principles' there have been forced upon them by the US and European legal machinery

Microsoft. Principles.

That'll be the day.
 
Shouldn't this be in Humour and Jokes? ;)
 
Gelion said:
Shouldn't this be in Humour and Jokes? ;)

:lol: That seems to be the consensus thus far...

the official site of the tenents is here, btw....
 
well well, 'not block access to any lawfull website' - doesn#t that mean that access to any website lawfull outsied but not lawfull inside the US will be blocked by windows worldwide? Isn't that a transfer of US law and morales to other countries with their own laws?



why oh why am I so suspicious of the Dark Si.... erh, Microsoft?
 
That's just something to keep the antitrust people off
their backs, spun to look like generosity on their part.
 
They already spent away their integrity to get where they are. If they want to earn it back it will take more than words, and a lot of time....

Don't get me wrong, Microsoft has made some good stuff, but their ethics are terribly suspect on some fronts.
 
The first one should've been "Microsoft knows what's best for you.". ;)
 
this should be moved to the humor and jokes forum ;)

Edit: Whoeps, seems more people think that too
 
I wonder if they'll take "supporting industry standards" so far as to gut IE of all of its proprietary junk. Hopefully that would make website developers actually design sites that work in ALL W3C compliant browsers.
 
VRWCAgent said:
I wonder if they'll take "supporting industry standards" so far as to gut IE of all of its proprietary junk. Hopefully that would make website developers actually design sites that work in ALL W3C compliant browsers.
chances are they'll just push even more proprietary junk in it and just declare it a "industry standard" :ack:
 
indeed agree with previous posts, and as far as i see it they are just allowing what things like dell do, clutter up your desktop with **** programs on a new pc.

doesnt say anything about being able to get rid of the fudgingg microsoft programs like IE or outlook.
 
nice pr stunt
 
Well, among the computer community Microsoft is quickly losing it's position as Evil Empire to Google. People are seeing Microsoft now as they saw IBM in the 90's, that is, a previously huge corporate Empire losing it's edge to newer, more aggresive contenders (back then Microsoft was the aggressive contender, now it's Google).
 
Please don't move to H&J; feel free to start a thread about the funny side there, but this is worth discussing...
The first principle goes to the installation of any software.

"We will ensure that Microsoft will design Windows in ways that make it easy for people to add non-Microsoft features," Smith said.
Read my lips:
L. I. E.

Let's see, there's a daily megadollar fine being imposed by the EU commission for doing ... not this.
There's the pile of crap called an ODF plugin.
Not to forget Samba.
There's a lovely track record that they haven't broken in dog's years of not playing nice to other formats, why should we believe them? :rolleyes:

So. Principle 1 - currently an outright lie, history speaks against it changing.
Principle 2 - the user is free to clutter up what they like. Great.
Principle 3 - nope, the ODF plugin that they're making explicitly fails this test.
Principle 4 - WTH?
Principle 5 - essentially, "we swear to behave like we were supposed to have been behaving all along as required by law". Why is this necessary to state?
Principle 6 - I'll believe it when I see it.
 
Telamar said:
why is it they are competing with google? am ignorant :)
Microsoft has MSN Search, Google has, well, Google. Microsoft has MSN Messenger and Google has Google Messenger. And so son.

Of course Google is not threatning Microsoft's main product (Windows), but there is indeed a trend of Google replacing Microsoft as the ultimate Evil Empire in the minds of Silicon Valley folks.
 
I don't know why they are gunning for Google anyway. Isn't Yahoo! top dog in the search engine wars?
 
Back
Top Bottom