The Africa Thread

I think they should. How could it be worse than 70% of government revenue going to debt repayments?
 
Your economy tanks, can't import stuff and your country goes bankrupt?
I cannot see how not being able to borrow more money can be worse than than level of dept servicing? It could be that they are actually still borrowing more than they are paying back, but that is not the way I read it. I read it that there was a flurry of corrupt borrowing and now they are paying it back.

I think Kenya has a significant export market, a lot of expensive fruit and flowers we get here come from Kenya.
 
Coffee apparently, I better go make a cup :)

Belgium seems really big in the world of Antiknock. I am amazed that Kenya spends $10 million in total on petrol additives.
Spoiler Amazing how different the UK and Belgium are in this regard :
MwchDPd.png
tKuwpdu.png
 
Last edited:
Maybe it is just shipped to Kenya and distributed from there, idk. how these things work exactly.

They may not be the final consumer...? Or you can ship from the UK to Belgium and from here to Kenya.
 
Maybe it is just shipped to Kenya and restributed from there, idk. how these things work exactly.

They may not be the final consumer...? Or you can ship from the UK to Belgium and from here to Kenya.
That makes sense. The differences was more about the >$100 million we spend each year on Kenyan tea compared to what you spend on Coffee. I had not realised how dominant Kenya was in the tea export market, or how small the UK is the in import market.
Spoiler Tea :
igL1gOp.png
Awe1mkB.png
 
I doubt the Kenya government defaulting and/or going bankrupt
would have much impact upon the supply of coffee or tea.

It might impact the supply of perishable fresh veg and flowers
by air, but that is arguably ecologically unsustainable.
 
I doubt the Kenya government defaulting and/or going bankrupt
would have much impact upon the supply of coffee or tea.

It might impact the supply of perishable fresh veg and flowers
by air, but that is arguably ecologically unsustainable.
I have to admit this is really stretching my understanding. From the OEC site, the total trade of Kenya is exports = $7.34B ($136 per person) and imports are $25.5B ($473 per person). From the World Bank General government final consumption expenditure = $13.92B which is 12.3% of GDP. I cannot find any better number for how much they are spending servicing the debt other than the "7 out of every 10 shillings collected go to pay debt" quoted above. If that means they spend 3 of every 10 shillings collected on general government final consumption expenditure then they spend $32.48B (13.92/0.3-13.92) servicing the debt which is about twice the trade deficit. Therefore defaulting should not impact imports.

There must be someone that can do these sums better than I?
 
I cannot see how not being able to borrow more money can be worse than than level of dept servicing? It could be that they are actually still borrowing more than they are paying back, but that is not the way I read it. I read it that there was a flurry of corrupt borrowing and now they are paying it back.

I think Kenya has a significant export market, a lot of expensive fruit and flowers we get here come from Kenya.

Zimbabwe come to mind. Can always be worse.

Unconditional loans don't really fix the original problem which would be government spending or corruption or both.

They would need another bail out in the near future. Debt to gdp ratio isn't bad which indicates government revenue is an issue.
 
Zimbabwe come to mind. Can always be worse.

Unconditional loans don't really fix the original problem which would be government spending or corruption or both.

They would need another bail out in the near future. Debt to gdp ratio isn't bad which indicates government revenue is an issue.
Why? The problem is a load of vanity projects. 80 - 90% of the Chinese debt is one failing railway, and all the money was spent on Chinese construction contracts.. Those have all long gone.
 
Why? The problem is a load of vanity projects. 80 - 90% of the Chinese debt is one failing railway, and all the money was spent on Chinese construction contracts.. Those have all long gone.

Are these vanity projects Zimbabwe or Kenya?

I regard belt and road as an outright debt trap.

Vanity projects are a recurring theme with them along with outright corruption.
 
Are these vanity projects Zimbabwe or Kenya?

I regard belt and road as an outright debt trap.

Vanity projects are a recurring theme with them along with outright corruption.
I am talking about Kenya. Agricultural nationalisation and land redistribution have nothing to do with national default. The solution to a debt trap is default.
 
I am talking about Kenya. Agricultural nationalisation and land redistribution have nothing to do with national default. The solution to a debt trap is default.

There's usually consequences there. Idk the particulars of a deal with China. I'm guessing they used national assets as collateral.

So they could nationalize them and suffer the Chinese consequences whatever they maybe.
 
There's usually consequences there. Idk the particulars of a deal with China. I'm guessing they used national assets as collateral.
That is only a vote in parliament away from cancellation. There is a thing called sovereignty.
 
That is only a vote in parliament away from cancellation. There is a thing called sovereignty.

There is but theres consequences. Sanctions, foreign loans dry up, whatever China decides to do.

And then you have people online shrieking about those consequences.

Eg North Korea deliberately defaulted on loans now no one will lend them money.

IDK what those consequences well be.
 
There is but theres consequences. Sanctions, foreign loans dry up, whatever China decides to do.
That is about all that happens. It gets harder to get foreign loans for a while. Now the sums I did above would make much more sense if they were actually still borrowing more than they were spending in servicing the debt, and in that case they probably should keep taking the money for as long as they can.

If however they are currently sending more money out than they are getting in cutting off both seems like it would be positive.
And then you have people online shrieking about those consequences.
I am pretty sure that is not the Kenyan states biggest problem right now.
Eg North Korea deliberately defaulted on loans now no one will lend them money.
It is true that North Korea deliberately defaulted on loans. It is also true that now no one will lend them money. Those are not totally directly causally related.that now no one will lend them money. Those are not totally directly causally related.
 
Back
Top Bottom