The AI Thread

Or traffic data just comes over the radio, like it does with navigation systems right now.

I live in a city with more than 1 million inhabitants and when "my" cell goes down, I still have some minimal signal, but I might as well be offline. And yes, some other operator might still have a signal, but car companies are not going to make deals with every operator there is.

Yes, cars have (and will have) a connection to the internet via the mobile network, but for applications which are not time-critical. A safety-relevant stream of data via the internet? That is not going to happen.
 

Bacon ice cream and nugget overload sees misfiring McDonald's AI withdrawn​

McDonald's is removing artificial intelligence (AI) powered ordering technology from its drive-through restaurants in the US, after customers shared its comical mishaps online.
A trial of the system, which was developed by IBM and uses voice recognition software to process orders, was announced in 2019.
It has not proved entirely reliable, however, resulting in viral videos of bizarre misinterpreted orders ranging from bacon-topped ice cream to hundreds of dollars' worth of chicken nuggets.
McDonald's told franchisees it would remove the tech from the more than 100 restaurants it has been testing it in by the end of July, as first reported by trade publication Restaurant Business.
"After thoughtful review, McDonald's has decided to end our current global partnership with IBM on AOT [Automated Order Taking] beyond this year," the restaurant chain said in a statement.
However, it added it remained confident the tech would still be "part of its restaurants’ future."
"We will continue to evaluate long-term, scalable solutions that will help us make an informed decision on a future voice ordering solution by the end of the year," the statement said.
The technology has been controversial from the outset, though initially concerns centred on its potential to make people's jobs obsolete.
However, it has become apparent that replacing human restaurant workers may not be as straightforward as people initially feared - and the system's backers hoped.
The AI order-taker's mishaps have been documented online.
In one video, which has 30,000 views on TikTok, a young woman becomes increasingly exasperated as she attempts to convince the AI that she wants a caramel ice cream, only for it to add multiple stacks of butter to her order.
In another, which has 360,000 views, a person claims that her order got confused with one being made by someone else, resulting in nine orders of tea being added to her bill.
Another popular video includes two people laughing while hundreds of dollars worth of chicken nuggets are added to their order, while the New York Post reported another person had bacon added to their ice cream in error.
The ending of this trial though does not mean an end to concerns about AI reshaping the workplace.
IBM said it would continue to work with McDonald's in the future.
"This technology is proven to have some of the most comprehensive capabilities in the industry, fast and accurate in some of the most demanding conditions," it said in a statement.
"While McDonald's is re-evaluating and refining its plans for AOT we look forward to continuing to work with them on a variety of other projects."
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c722gne7qngo
 
Deepfake Nigel Farage blows up Rish!'s house in minecraft.

 
The real question here is: Did the robot AI predict that the French speaker would use a cheese metaphor?

Public servants uneasy as government 'spy' robot prowls federal offices
Government says robot a tool to optimize workspaces and can't identify individual employees
A device federal public servants call "the little robot" began appearing in Gatineau office buildings in March.

It travels through the workplace to collect data using about 20 sensors and a 360-degree camera, according to Yahya Saad, co-founder of GlobalDWS, which created the robot.

"Using AI on the robot, the camera takes the picture, analyzes and counts the number of people and then discards the image," he said.

Part of a platform known as VirBrix, the robot also gathers information on air quality, light levels, noise, humidity, temperature and even measures CO2, methane and radon gas.
...
Given the distrust some public servants have for the robot, researcher Pierrot Péladeau said the government seems to be treating its employees "a little bit like furniture."

Péladeau, an adviser in the social assessment of information systems, has doubts about the quality of the data the robot will produce.

He said employees may decide to "toy with the robot" and behave differently in its presence simply to mess with the data it collects.

"They are making a big Swiss cheese," he said in French. "There are a lot of holes."

 
Forget STEM. Head of Paris’s top tech university says the secret to France’s AI boom is a focus on the humanities
France’s universities are fast becoming a hunting ground for investors hungry to unravel the source of the next AI revolution.

But if investors are expecting their next billionaire founder to be the archetypal nerd writing code, they will likely be surprised to find a multilingual, sporty Parisian undergrad with a penchant for the arts pitching their multibillion-dollar idea instead.
...
‘AI in every discipline’
Dominique Rossin, Provost at École Polytechnique, says that while his students will focus on STEM courses, there is also a strong emphasis on foreign languages, sports, humanities, social sciences, arts, and literature.

“AI is now instilling every discipline the same way mathematics did years ago,” Rossin said.

“We really push our students out of their comfort zone and encourage them to try new subjects and discover new areas in science.”
...

About time too!
 
Some people probably would enjoy bacon ice cream. You get bacon with practically everything else at fast food places in Canada.

After all, there's an abomination at one of the bakeries I used to go to - bacon-flavored frosting on long johns (a kind of rectangular donut). It's disgusting.
 
If Americans can put maple syrup on bacon how could anyone complain about bacon ice cream?

Spoiler That image is bigger than it needs to be :

pouring-syrup-over-maple-bacon-ice-cream-on-waffles-720x1080.jpg.webp

 
I don't understand much about the law, but the excerpts for the complainants provided by the BBC don't seem to provide any strong argument besides emotive language

El Reg has a bit more details including links to the complaints. I think this is the weakest of the cases so far. They identify overfitting, and while I think they could use this to argue that the AI is producing a derivative work as I understand it this is not their case. They only use that as evidence that the AI was trained on the music. If they did that training without making a copy, for example 'cos they bought a CD, I think their case falls apart.
 
I don't understand much about the law, but the excerpts for the complainants provided by the BBC don't seem to provide any strong argument besides emotive language


This is just a news article, you should read the complaint in the case if you want to know more. I'm completely on the side of the record labels on this one, generative AI is a planet-killing plagiarism machine that doesn't even really work as advertised.
 
Dude on one them, it was "make a viking metal song" as one of the top examples on the site. It was EXACTLY a stylistic and sonic recreation of viking metal band Tyr. Like, not even a hodgepodge of different viking metal artists. Just Tyr doing their thing. Of course done worse, (thankfully, really), but there was no deeper musical genomics than "viking metal is most tightly exemplified by Tyr and we have 20 million micro samples of them to recreate a song".
 
Dude on one them, it was "make a viking metal song" as one of the top examples on the site. It was EXACTLY a stylistic and sonic recreation of viking metal band Tyr. Like, not even a hodgepodge of different viking metal artists. Just Tyr doing their thing. Of course done worse, (thankfully, really), but there was no deeper musical genomics than "viking metal is most tightly exemplified by Tyr and we have 20 million micro samples of them to recreate a song".
Does that make the result a derivative work? If a human listened to Tyr and came up with something as similar would they be restricted in releasing their music? What about Elvis Presley/Chuck Berry?
 
There have been many such cases. The question is where is this relative to that line? It should be fairly easy to objectively quantify.

Note I pointed out that they are NOT pursuing this argument in this case, which I think is surprising.
 
It will be interesting to see. It seems that the output of Github/Microsoft CoPilot is so much closer to the creation of a derivative work than more artist stuff I have seen that that has to be banned if the artistic stuff is.
 
Researchers fool university markers with AI-generated exam papers

Researchers at the University of Reading fooled their own professors by secretly submitting AI-generated exam answers that went undetected and got better grades than real students.

The project created fake student identities to submit unedited answers generated by ChatGPT-4 in take-home online assessments for undergraduate courses.

The university’s markers – who were not told about the project – flagged only one of the 33 entries, with the remaining AI answers receiving higher than average grades than the students.

Prof Karen Yeung, a fellow in law, ethics and informatics at the University of Birmingham, said: “The publication of this real-world quality assurance test demonstrates very clearly that the generative AI tools freely and openly available enable students to cheat take-home examinations without difficulty to obtain better grades, yet such cheating is virtually undetectable.”
 
Researchers fool university markers with AI-generated exam papers

Researchers at the University of Reading fooled their own professors by secretly submitting AI-generated exam answers that went undetected and got better grades than real students.

The project created fake student identities to submit unedited answers generated by ChatGPT-4 in take-home online assessments for undergraduate courses.

The university’s markers – who were not told about the project – flagged only one of the 33 entries, with the remaining AI answers receiving higher than average grades than the students.

Prof Karen Yeung, a fellow in law, ethics and informatics at the University of Birmingham, said: “The publication of this real-world quality assurance test demonstrates very clearly that the generative AI tools freely and openly available enable students to cheat take-home examinations without difficulty to obtain better grades, yet such cheating is virtually undetectable.”

Guarantee these exam questions are poorly constructed
 
Back
Top Bottom