warpus
Sommerswerd asked me to change this
Christians gave me a stupid rash that almost ruined my trip to Peru. I had to use a strong heretic creme to clear up the affected areas.
Ok, I just about had enough of those $$%#$%$%@ Christians! 2 weeks ago I ordered NHL 2012 on account of me buying a playstation drei. Delivery time: 5 to 7 days. So I've got today planned to have some mates over, some beers and a good time. Checked the order status on the page, it was supposed to be here yesterday. Yesterday I got home, still no game, so I decided to call them. So they told me it could be another 7 days!
Bloody Christians!
How annoying is this for for instance Protestants that a. the differences are unknown (perhaps linking to the discussion about religious education) and b. that Catholic specific take is bandied out as representing every Christian?
How annoying is this for for instance Protestants that a. the differences are unknown (perhaps linking to the discussion about religious education) and b. that Catholic specific take is bandied out as representing every Christian?
I do, but there is hardly a consensus on most issues, so it is pretty hard to explain what a Christian is beyond some very vague terms... such as, accepts Christ...I'm thinking more in the lines of a third party, a non-Christian, who gets to hear this 'expert' say these things and as a result is under the impression every Christian sees the pope as a replacement of Christ on Earth.
Maybe a bit along the same lines as people who hear something about a scientific theory like Global Warming, and then state it as fact themselves. (Think of the infamous: a vulcano spews more CO2 than all humans in a year) That irritates me as well. So, I'm wondering if Christians care how non-Christians see Christianity, especially when their views are misinformed.
That is only true for some evangelical Protestant leaders. The rest of them would likely be laughed out of their congregations if they stated any such thing. AFAIK even Billy Graham hasn't claimed that God has personally spoken to him.In the US, I don't know about elsewhere, but here it is pretty common for Protestant leaders to claim that God has spoken to them, and so they are the ones who know the truth, and therefor everyone should follow what that leader says to be true.
Not sure whether this is too off topic for this thread, but since it 'replaced' the Ask a Christian thread.
In some news related program which I saw yesterday on jewtube there was a panel who was debating about the Pope and it's role in Christianity, and one of the guys who was invited (unknown to me, probably atheist, never specifically mentioned) claimed the role was of the utmost importance since the Pope is the replacement of Christ on Earth. Now I'm not sure, but I believe that is the Catholic way of thinking while Protestant don't consider the Pope to be. (I should have read more of the Cath vs Prot threadCorrect me if I'm wrong)
How annoying is this for for instance Protestants that a. the differences are unknown (perhaps linking to the discussion about religious education) and b. that Catholic specific take is bandied out as representing every Christian?
That is only true for some evangelical Protestant leaders. The rest of them would likely be laughed out of their congregations if they stated any such thing. AFAIK even Billy Graham hasn't claimed that God has personally spoken to him.
How does that spiritual thing change into the usually rather specific message?