Do we mean to conduct this debate in real time or over a set period? I can't spend much time debating this evening. If I cannot continue the debate I would like to ask that Her Majesty's loyal subject Lord Pilate be allowed to stand in for me.
sure (but dont give me that handiling of rules, I have the official model UN rules 10 inches fromr right now ) but sure, I'll switch with you
on the condition that I am the recognized started of the next modek UN game thread
OK, as President I decree that the first topic be Saddam Hussein's trial. I will make it official in the first post.
FIRST we need to finish roll call. After that everyone must PM me requesting right to speak, and I will post the speaking list in the order I receive the PMs (with myself being first, because I'm President ). While we are making introductory statements on the topic you may work to construct a resolution via PM. Remember you need at least 2 people to support the resolution.
also, I have a general game suggestion- the Maximum amoutn of time the game can last is two weeks- after that, even if no resolution has been passed, the next UN game begins- this keeps things fresh, however, if there is a 3/4 majority vote, and the majority wins, the previous topic of discussion wil be continued in the next two week maximum UN session
why dont we let this be the first topic of discussion then- after all what better way to kick things off with all nation having a say in how the game is run?
as fo rthe time limit- there HAS to be one- after all, there is a changing of who is preseidnt in the UN, and this should be reflected in who starts the thread- basically, the line of player succesiion has already been proved- it is the "current" prez' choice at what player becomes the next president, all we need to do now is set the time limit for the presidency
The only problem is that - no offense to anyone - some of the players aren't fit to be President. Some people aren't here enough, etc.
I say we do what we did in the old UN - pretend it was a one-day session, so no changing of Presidents, etc. But, when this UN dies and the next one starts, we can reflect the current President.
thats the beuty of it- youve already named me the successor- you know that I am more the fit to handle it- I'm here enough, and am into it enough- I can assure you i will make a wise choice at a successor- and so on and so forth- its a non-issue, as long as it is always a wise choice- it worked for ancient ROme after all, thigs only got screwy in the imperial succession when someones son claimed th imperatorship, or there was a civil war
i think that problem is resolved by letting people choose there own successor president for the next game
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.