Alvaro da Luna
Warlord
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2004
- Messages
- 256
It's not actually mandatory, it's just very hard not to have one. But you don't have to use it much, or at all.What I actually find disturbing is that it is now mandatory to have a credit cart (mainly because of that Credit History thing), yet it certainly doesn't have to be that way.
I also am not very fond of the fact that credit card companies basically charge for each transaction, but forbid businesses to reflect that charge in their prices - in other words, even though a business earns more money when a consumer pays cash, it cannot make the consumer pay a bit less if they pay with cash.
It's not actually mandatory, it's just very hard not to have one. But you don't have to use it much, or at all.
What I actually find disturbing is that it is now mandatory to have a credit cart (mainly because of that Credit History thing), yet it certainly doesn't have to be that way.
I also am not very fond of the fact that credit card companies basically charge for each transaction, but forbid businesses to reflect that charge in their prices - in other words, even though a business earns more money when a consumer pays cash, it cannot make the consumer pay a bit less if they pay with cash.
What laws are they breaking?So, do you think that the credit card industry is guilty of malpractice?
The question should really be that how can you teach people to not be tempted to purchase goods at a relative short time and price that they cannot afford?Or do you think it's the consumer's responsibility to become better educated and learn how to properly use a credit card?
We can only dream that we can destroy all datas of credit.
Or how we can teach credit card companies not to issue credit cards to consumers with bad profiles. Bailing out the credit card comapnies with corporate welfare legislation sends the wrong message. These companies need to get burned if they are issuing risky lines of credit. It is the only way they are going to learn to lend more responsibly.The question should really be that how can you teach people to not be tempted to purchase goods at a relative short time and price that they cannot afford?
True.I remember that my brother told me that in some sense closely akin to mortagage loans.Or how we can teach credit card companies not to issue credit cards to consumers with bad profiles. Bailing out the credit card comapnies with corporate welfare legislation sends the wrong message. These companies need to get burned if they are issuing risky lines of credit. It is the only way they are going to learn to lend more responsibly.
That's the next bailout coming as I'm sure both parties are being heavily lobbied by the lenders who are about to take a big hit from their irresponsible lending practices.True.I remember that my brother told me that in some sense closely akin to mortagage loans.
Credit card companies are basically legal bookies, and as such, people who deal with them should treat them as such.
1)Never get a card that charges a yearly fee.
2)Never carry a balance.
If you follow those 2 suggestions, you won't have credit card problems.
It's irrational spending by consumers that allow the CC companies to make billions of dollars annually.
If you can't afford something, don't buy it. It's as simple as that.
What laws are they breaking?
So in order to give a sarcastic twist to that thread, it's basically okay for a company to screw up stupid people?
So in order to give a sarcastic twist to that thread, it's basically okay for a company to screw up stupid people?
This goes back to the second part of the OP. Is saying that the check is due at 10:00 on May 1st (for example), but the credit card companies, knowing that their mail isn't received until 11:00, breaking the law or just merely being unethical by charging the consumer a late fee because they received the check an hour late (when they knew ahead of time that would happen, while the consumer would have no idea when the credit card companies receive their mail).
It may not be technically illegal, but sure is unethical.
Is it ok for stupid people to screw them self? Since its volentary to do business with the company the idiots have no one to blame but thenselves.
Is it ok for stupid people to screw them self? Since its volentary to do business with the company the idiots have no one to blame but thenselves.