• We are currently performing site maintenance, parts of civfanatics are currently offline, but will come back online in the coming days (this includes any time you see the message "account suspended"). For more updates please see here.

The Death Penalty and Illinois

I too see where you are coming from Joe, but I refer to people who do not or choose not to recognise the existence of those rights.

Ultimately, the concept of 'human rights' hinges upon the existence of an 'absolute morality', something that few people are willing to accept the existence of.

Either there is, or there is not, a set of moral rules and laws that are true and applicable in all circumstances. If there is such a set, then you are correct, and all humans deserve to be judged by that standard, and indeed, should never be judged by any other, IE everything is in black and white. If there is not, then really, it all comes down to whose side in a particular issue the judge is on, and everything is a grey area.

I happen to agree with the absolutists. Reduced to their basic facts, all moral dilemmas end up being black and white issues, where on side is wrong, and the other is right. There are no grey areas.

If we pursue this, I heartily reccommend a new topic. We have branched away from the death penalty for certain.
 
Hmm.

"Ultimately, the concept of 'human rights' hinges upon the existence of an 'absolute morality', something that few people are willing to accept the existence of."

Okay we're gonna go off topic so I'll stop at this last post (I'm going home anyway).

I don't believe absolute right and wrong exists, our definitions will always be purely arbitrary, but you *can* base human rights on arbitrary standards of right and wrong, indeed you *have* to.

What I'm saying here, on-topic, is that your punishments must not contravene the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

The DP is topical here in Europe as it is a requirement to join the EU, and if you haven't heard 10 more states are now allowed to join, several of which have modified their laws to comply with this (amongst others).

Of all the requirements I truly believe this is one of the most basic neccessities for civilised society. The state *must not* have the power to execute it's citizens. Agreed it's hard to do something with murderers and the rest, but as Picard said 'The line is drawn *here*'.

Cheers.
 
Back
Top Bottom