aelf
Ashen One
So we can think about consequences of a war with Peter and also to consider early trading partners, etc.
Everybody is either cautious or pleased with each other and there are no religious allies yet. It's too early to say.
So we can think about consequences of a war with Peter and also to consider early trading partners, etc.
Round 2: 2480BC - 1440BC
First, we had to decide on which techs to pursue next. I decided on The Wheel, Pottery and Writing. This means the Oracle and MC for Colossus are pretty much out of the question now. If we wanted them, we needed to grab Priesthood asap to start on the Oracle, and without early MC, I really doubt our chances of getting the Colossus.
That would go against our stated aims. Also, the consequences of early war need to be given more consideration on these forums. There's the example of worker stealing. In the past, people advocated doing it, but now there's greater realisation that doing so might bring more harm than good, since you forego a potential (early) trading partner before you can get a clearer picture of what is your first objective in the game for a worker you may not be able to bring back home. Likewise, why should we fight a war over a city if we don't have to? The time might not be ripe to attack Peter.
Gold helps research, which is in step with our early game objectives. Also, bronze site is further from our nearest neighbour and therefore less likely to be stolen
Why? Just because Angkor Wat is a priest-based wonder doesn't make Angkor Wat only suitable for a GP-focused strategy. In fact, as cabert has pointed out, it's easy to get Philosophy early with a GS. We could change gears after getting the wonder.
You will permanantly state against early war even if the map would dictate one? So you would have been fine if he had settled your copper city?
voek said:Gold helps research, but the primary need is for hammers and food. Next to that, you didn't knew Peter was more South then North, so the gold city being more close would still be a gamble.
voek said:Maybe you could elaborate where the Angkor Wat fits in your overall strategy?
My point is normally when you use the Angkor Wat in a strategy it is in a GP based strategy. Why should be obvious.
you're already counting the bounty...
build the damn thing first![]()
Yes, Angkor Wat will certainly depend on the situation. But I still disagree about having to pursue a GP-based strategy. Sometimes you needn't lock yourself into a one-track strategy. I like the power of being able to switch from GS's to prophets.
Anyway, I think you misunderstood me, voek. We will farm GS's up to Education, after which we'll switch completely to prophets, the first of which will build the shrine. And, as Phrederick says, settling the rest of the prophets is not a bad thing. The extra wealth and hammers will be decent with all those multipliers in place.
Anyway, I think you misunderstood me, voek. We will farm GS's up to Education, after which we'll switch completely to prophets, the first of which will build the shrine.