The European Project: the future of the EU.

Since the centre parties just like maintaining everything bad the way it is, and the far lefts parties in my country are very much pro Russia or pro terrorists I voted for the party that is very much against the far left and addresses the problems no other party likes to talk about, also conservative values (sue me:smoke:)...but hey go ahead and keep throwing those virtual stones at me:smug:!
 
The thing is I don't enjoy contributing with my vote to send a politician whose speech, ideology, attitudes I dislike to his golden retirement dream job!
 
The thing is I don't enjoy contributing with my vote to send a politician whose speech, ideology, attitudes I dislike to his golden retirement dream job!
I have never had the luxury of not doing that.
 
The thing is I don't enjoy contributing with my vote to send a politician whose speech, ideology, attitudes I dislike to his golden retirement dream job!
But now you will contribute with your vote to a fraction in the EU parliament that will try to sabotage any effort to support Ukraine on a EU level.

And that was entirely predictable.

They will likely fail though, but you risk being a frustrated voter now 😊

Edit, you can also vote on someone down the list if you really dislike those at the top, in a small country, typically only a few of any party actually make it to EU parliament..
 
Last edited:
but hey go ahead and keep throwing those virtual stones at me:smug:!
You're the one who literally voted for a candidate whose ideological leanings are as plain as day for anyone else reading. What would you like people to say? You voted, you got an outcome. Enjoy!
 
But now you will contribute with your vote to a fraction in the EU parliament that will try to sabotage any effort to support Ukraine on a EU level.

And that was entirely predictable.

They will likely fail though, but you risk being a frustrated voter now 😊

Edit, you can also vote on someone down the list if you really dislike those at the top, in a small country, typically only a few of any party actually make it to EU parliament..
We don't have lists to vote for individual candidates here! The party has a list, but we haven't the right to choose from that list.

You're the one who literally voted for a candidate whose ideological leanings are as plain as day for anyone else reading. What would you like people to say? You voted, you got an outcome. Enjoy!
You definitely don't know who António Tânger Correia is, but here is a wiki link for you:
 

Survey reveals surge in burnout and suicidal thoughts among ECB staff​


FRANKFURT — The number of European Central Bank staff suffering burnout symptoms has risen sharply since 2021, with the proportion of employees harboring suicidal thoughts up by 50 percent over four years, an independent survey commissioned by its staff committee showed.
The survey suggests that the broader rise in mental health problems across Europe since the pandemic hasn't spared the central bank. It is also consistent with the findings of an earlier survey conducted by the staff union in December last year, which showed the extraordinary circumstances of the last four years had taken a significant toll on staff morale.
The ECB said it took the well-being of staff “very seriously,” and has taken measures to address problems and will continue to do so. Staff representatives nonetheless accuse the ECB of ignoring warning signs and exposing policymaking to the risk of error caused by burned-out staff.
“We cannot watch the significant surge in suicidality over the last four years without questioning the responsibility of the leadership in charge,” said staff committee chair Carlos Bowles. “Burnout is known to induce poor decision-making and this is not what we want for the ECB where millions of European citizens could be negatively impacted by an error in data analysis, macroeconomics forecasting or simply poor judgment as regards the reality of the economic situation.”
Using the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory diagnostic tool, a diagnostic tool designed to measure physical and cognitive aspects of burnout, the independent provider Psy@work said that 38.9 percent of survey participants qualified for its burnout category, complaining of exhaustion and disengagement. That was up 5 percentage points from the last such survey conducted in 2021. The share of people who had thought they would be better off dead in the two weeks prior to taking the survey rose to 9.1 percent from 6.1 percent in 2021.
The survey was conducted between April 11 and May 8 with 1,602 out of roughly 4,600 eligible staff members choosing to complete the test.

Favoritism drives burnout​

The source of stress reported by those suffering from burnout symptoms mostly related to perceptions of unfair treatment.
Almost all burnout respondents complained about power games at the Bank. Meanwhile, almost nine in 10 complained about perceived favoritism and nearly as many said that opportunities to get ahead were not based on merit. Even among respondents outside the burnout group, more than 60 percent made the same complaint about favoritism and only half trusted the appeals procedure for regulating disputes.
“It’s not all about workload,” said Bowles. “For years we have faced widespread complaints of rigged recruitment and promotions, with the inevitable consequence that many hard-working colleagues developed psychosomatic symptoms and suffered mental harm.”
Even so, a heavy workload and subpar management style were also cited by the vast majority of those in the burnout category as a cause of stress.

Seven out of 10 of those staff members reported that they regularly work extra hours. Among those who did not fall into the burnout category, one in six said they are regularly working late. Meanwhile, only around a third of respondents said their manager makes people feel enthusiastic or inspires them to get the best out of them.
The survey also saw a resurfacing of allegations of some extreme behavior at the Bank, a problem that has featured in a previous staff survey. Over 40 respondents reported that they had experienced serious physical or verbal threats while 12 said they had experienced physical violence, either from a colleague, a superior or a client. Another 15 staff members reported that somebody at work used a position of authority to pressure them into unwanted sexual activity.
ECB staff are not alone in experiencing a rise in work-related stress levels. Surveys among the broader population, such as one from the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work, have shown that work stress increased during the coronavirus pandemic. A lack of comparable data makes it hard to draw firm conclusions on the current level and trend of burnout and suicidal thinking in all of Europe, although available research indicates that, in 2021, the suicidal thought rate among the broader population was 2 percentage points lower than at the ECB.

Follow-up failure​

Bowles has no doubt where responsibility for that lies.
“The president and the executive board have handled ECB psychosocial risks with an utter lack of care which border on gross negligence,” he said. “The autocratic leadership style of the executive board and their refusal to take action explains why we have so many colleagues in a situation of burnout today."
According to Bowles, management failed to respond to an alarming well-being survey back in 2021, and took only half-hearted measures after its own survey in April 2023 produced similarly disconcerting evidence.
Beyond launching workshops to encourage colleagues to identify and react to inappropriate behavior, the ECB launched a task force with staff representatives reviewing the disciplinary framework and its internal reporting and investigations processes. So far this has not resulted in any concrete measures, Bowles said.

After learning of the staff committee’s survey results on May 16, CSO Myriam Moufakkir and HR chief Eva Murciano reached out to staff to assure them they take “the results very seriously.”
However, staff members' skepticism has only increased since the executive board postponed a meeting with the staff committee at the last minute the evening before it was due to take place on May 28, claiming they needed to reschedule to allow for a longer meeting.
“What message does HR and the president send with the cancellation? It's not that bad? Who cares?” one staff member wrote on the anonymous ECB staff union chat on the issues. The meeting eventually took place on June 25.

ECB is taking measures​

On the evening of June 25, Moufakkir sent out an email to all staff listing a slew of measures aimed at addressing concerns. This included recommendations to revise the processes the Bank uses to report and investigate inappropriate behavior and to ensure they are robust and timely. It also recommended efforts to boost job mobility and learning experiences.

According to the mail, the ECB's human resources department is planning to initiate focus groups to identify possible solutions to address excessive workload, with aims to expand training for managers and strengthen feedback capabilities and tools.
“We take the health and well-being of our staff very seriously, and we will continue to engage with the staff committee and all our colleagues on these topics and their root causes. We have put measures in place to respond to issues which had been identified previously and more measures to address issues such as workload and career opportunities are planned,” an ECB spokesperson told POLITICO.
She added that the ECB provides services to support mental and physical health and stressed there is no institutional tolerance of inappropriate behaviour. “Our 2024 pulse survey shows that 85 percent of respondents are proud to work for the ECB and 90 percent believe in the mission and purpose of the ECB, and we will work to sustain that support,” she said.

The ECB did not address questions on whether it is concerned that current levels of burnout may harm the Bank's ability to perform its duties in the best possible way.
Definitely not the first thing that comes to my mind when talking about the ECB!
 
I wonder if the ubiquitous working at home and smart phones culture has contributed to the stress.

In the good old days people went to office worked their hours undistracted by domestic matters and switched off.
 
We don't have lists to vote for individual candidates here! The party has a list, but we haven't the right to choose from that list.


You definitely don't know who António Tânger Correia is, but here is a wiki link for you:
That's a serious deficiency of your electoral system and should be remedied.

No, obviously I know nothing about Portugese politics, but from your link there his position on the Ukrainian war seems clear,

On the Russo-Ukrainian War, António Tânger Corrêa, the party vice president and the leader of the party's list in the 2024 European Parliament election, has been critical of Ukraine,[57] advocating a peace deal that would involve "reinforced cooperation" between Ukraine and Russia in a way that the "Russians feel comfortable".[58]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chega_(political_party)#cite_note-58

That's obvious new speak for "surrender". Hope you didn't vote for that one, or his party.
 
You definitely don't know who António Tânger Correia is, but here is a wiki link for you
Thanks! It took me here:
But Snowgerry has already covered that nicely.

In the good old days people went to office worked their hours undistracted by domestic matters and switched off.
Pretty sure stress factors in a job are present whether or not you have a phone and whether or not you're in an office.
 
Still much different from the pro russian far left candidates. I voted for him because he's the most sober candidate from my point of view. Center left front runner was a disaster Health minister, Center right candidate is a kid, not too bad though, but still not my go to candidate. Libertarian candidate...well is libertarian and i don't swing that way.
 
Still much different from the pro russian far left candidates. I voted for him because he's the most sober candidate from my point of view.
And your vote got you exactly what you voted for. Sorry, I don't know how to make it simpler than that.
 
And your vote got you exactly what you voted for. Sorry, I don't know how to make it simpler than that.

Yup. I did a split vote labor/Greens. Got exactly what I expected (labour being useless, greens more useless. Still better than the other 3 clowns).
 
We don't have lists to vote for individual candidates here! The party has a list, but we haven't the right to choose from that list.


You definitely don't know who António Tânger Correia is, but here is a wiki link for you:

The oligarchs and their useful idiots. I can even gues at your age...

That's what we got from the massification of education opportunities. @EnglishEdward We pretended to educate, copyed Tony Blair's english model. And produced a new generation of diploma-carrying empty-headed youths, frustrated that they won't get the privileged position they expected because there was "elite overproduction" (and they're not elite in any sense anyway). So they vote for the peddlers of simplified decadence stories. The careeirist, moderately smart ones who know what they're doing (politics as usual) and the useful idiots who work for them in the so-called "new populist" parties. One distraction after another for the proles. Spain had german-financed "cuidadanos", and then the "vox", here we have "chega" the the (at least appropriately named, for a change) "liberals". The oligarchi hedged their bet with two for a start! And unlike cuidadanos it was mostly financed by the locals. A real german success story, Portugal... these phony "populists" and phony "nationalists" will not say one word against teh european union and the euro, of course. They don't bite the hands that feed them.

Won't get as far as a Millei here. But there's a sizeable minority who just doesn't know anything about history and politics (were never taught anythin useful) and falls for it. That's the whole poing. Ti distract public resentment and prevent any threat to the existing system. If any "populists" do reach power, they turn out to be like the italian pretend-fascist. Good liberals, all of them.
 
An Eu that actually tries to re-militarize (the countries which conspicuously aren't yet militarized but would make a difference if they did, eg Germany) will be an even poorer Eu and more of a vassal. Germany itself was very happy staying out of the military race, because it meant far more money (not having to maintain an actual, meaningful army and just selling arms to others), not to mention how much their industry has suffered from paying more for energy.
Any future with re-militarization is in tautology with economic and democratic decline for something like the Eu which isn't even a federal state but a collection of very different countries.
It'd be pointless too, given that with current tech any war with a nuclear power will mean that only nukes will be a deterrent (since trade relations are already crippled).
 
An Eu that actually tries to re-militarize (the countries which conspicuously aren't yet militarized but would make a difference if they did, eg Germany) will be an even poorer Eu and more of a vassal. Germany itself was very happy staying out of the military race, because it meant far more money (not having to maintain an actual, meaningful army and just selling arms to others), not to mention how much their industry has suffered from paying more for energy.
Any future with re-militarization is in tautology with economic and democratic decline for something like the Eu which isn't even a federal state but a collection of very different countries.
It'd be pointless too, given that with current tech any war with a nuclear power will mean that only nukes will be a deterrent (since trade relations are already crippled).

So for all your anti EU and NATO rhetoric do you see Greece with German monetary and collective security with Turkey next door.

What to stop Turkey pulling off a special military operation. No ANZACs or British even trying to help out,no USA to come bail you out after ze Germans.

Albania 2.0 learning Turkish at school?
 
@EnglishEdward
We pretended to educate, copyed Tony Blair's english model. And produced a new generation of diploma-carrying empty-headed youths, frustrated that they won't get the privileged position they expected because there was "elite overproduction" (and they're not elite in any sense anyway).

I cannot speak for the EU. The main problem with Tony Blair's "Education, Education, Education" is that the UK state loans
system worsened the existing mismatch between the education nominally provided and the education society actually needed.
The UK needs more dentists, driving examiners, electricians, medical doctors, nurses, opticians, vets and other specialities.
But the universities took the easier option of providing more courses on lighter weight (pseudo) academic subjects instead.

BTW the EU is offering the UK a free movement for under 30s, supposedly students, deal. As English is widely spoken
in the EU and the English are rarely fluent in other languages; that'd result in another unbalanced movement of people.
Sir Keir Starmer may, trying to ingratiate himself with the EU, accept such a scheme without any capping of numbers.
That would be the EU trying to, in part offload, its unemployed under 30s to the UK. There would then be a surfeit of
continentals here looking for places in the UK to live they could afford on a Deliveroo etc. bike rider/waiter salary !
Thing is I am in favour of student exchange; but it ought to be on a proper basis, genuine useful courses rather than
just a cover for immigration; with the uni or a host family providing spare room, but I suspect it'd all be just chaos.
 
The oligarchs and their useful idiots. I can even gues at your age...

That's what we got from the massification of education opportunities. @EnglishEdward We pretended to educate, copyed Tony Blair's english model. And produced a new generation of diploma-carrying empty-headed youths, frustrated that they won't get the privileged position they expected because there was "elite overproduction" (and they're not elite in any sense anyway). So they vote for the peddlers of simplified decadence stories. The careeirist, moderately smart ones who know what they're doing (politics as usual) and the useful idiots who work for them in the so-called "new populist" parties. One distraction after another for the proles. Spain had german-financed "cuidadanos", and then the "vox", here we have "chega" the the (at least appropriately named, for a change) "liberals". The oligarchi hedged their bet with two for a start! And unlike cuidadanos it was mostly financed by the locals. A real german success story, Portugal... these phony "populists" and phony "nationalists" will not say one word against teh european union and the euro, of course. They don't bite the hands that feed them.

Won't get as far as a Millei here. But there's a sizeable minority who just doesn't know anything about history and politics (were never taught anythin useful) and falls for it. That's the whole poing. Ti distract public resentment and prevent any threat to the existing system. If any "populists" do reach power, they turn out to be like the italian pretend-fascist. Good liberals, all of them.
Please do!
I am so happy for all of you that you have a conservative target to bash at:goodjob:
I am also very eager for more bashing, although I think constructive critique or teachings would be more usefull
 
Top Bottom