Akka
Moody old mage.
Sorry, but I think you got this reversed.Ah see, we found the knot in your otherwise pretty good cord. It's a pretty big knot. The correct default puts the burden of proof on you. You can articulate that you have an avenue you find compelling, one strong enough to tell others you find it compelling, and personally strong enough for you to live your life accordingly.
But if you articulate that, indeed, what looks to me like a (big) leap of confirmation bias faith is the truth until proven otherwise, you've both logically and behaviorally stepped into the very realms you've recognized other folk in recent threads as dubiously doing.
My point is simply the that considering the fact the typical biological differences between men and women are matching the typical behavioural patterns we see in the overwhelming majority of the world, these behaviour tends to stem from nature.
(I hope we can all be reasonable about it and skip the lengthy list of biological/social/psychological features that fit a hunter-gatherer society with the male providers and female reproducers ?)
(I also hope that the "it's about general trends" statistical caveat is well understood and we can avoid the pointless outliers examples that are irrelevant to the larger picture)
It's more of a simple observation. You're the ones saying that this observation is wrong and it's more due to culture. You're the ones going against the simplest explanation, and as such having the burden of proof.